Difference between revisions of "Protection of intact newborns in hospital"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Create page.)
 
(Add text and citation.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Construction Site}}
 
{{Construction Site}}
−
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is an important but frequently overlooked parental duty for parents of a newborn [[intact]] boy in an American maternity hospital. Non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of newborn boys remains a common practice despite its unethical nature. Circumcision is a profit center for hospitals, so many will promote circumcision in various ways. It is easy for nursery attendant to make a mistake and bring an intact boy for an unwanted circumcision.
+
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is an important but frequently overlooked parental duty for parents of a newborn [[intact]] boy in an American maternity hospital. Non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of newborn boys remains a common practice despite its unethical nature. Circumcision is a profit center for hospitals, so many will promote circumcision in various ways. It is easy for nursery attendant to make a mistake and bring an intact boy for an unwanted circumcision. Mansfield et al. (1995) report when a newborn is to be [[circumcised]], both mother and newborn remain in hospital an average of six hours longer which substantially increases revenue to the hospital,<ref>{{REFjournal
 +
|last=Mansfield
 +
|first=
 +
|init=CJ
 +
|author-link=
 +
|last2=Heuston
 +
|first2=
 +
|init2=WF
 +
|author2-link=
 +
|last3=Rudy
 +
|first3=
 +
|init3=M
 +
|author3-link=
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=Neonatal circumcision: associated factors and length of hospital stay
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|journal=J Fam Pract
 +
|location=
 +
|date=1995-10
 +
|volume=41
 +
|issue=4
 +
|article=
 +
|pages=370-6
 +
|url=https://www.cirp.org/library/procedure/mansfield/
 +
|archived=
 +
|quote=
 +
|pubmedID=7561711
 +
|pubmedCID=
 +
|DOI=
 +
|accessdate=2023-05-22
 +
}}</ref> so hospitals encourage and promote circumcision regardless of the [[pain]], [[trauma]], and loss of tissue and function.
  
 
{{LINKS}}
 
{{LINKS}}

Revision as of 16:25, 22 May 2023

Construction Site

This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.

 

Protection of intact newborns in hospital is an important but frequently overlooked parental duty for parents of a newborn intact boy in an American maternity hospital. Non-therapeutic circumcision of newborn boys remains a common practice despite its unethical nature. Circumcision is a profit center for hospitals, so many will promote circumcision in various ways. It is easy for nursery attendant to make a mistake and bring an intact boy for an unwanted circumcision. Mansfield et al. (1995) report when a newborn is to be circumcised, both mother and newborn remain in hospital an average of six hours longer which substantially increases revenue to the hospital,[1] so hospitals encourage and promote circumcision regardless of the pain, trauma, and loss of tissue and function.

External links


References

  1. ↑ REFjournal Mansfield CJ, Heuston WF, Rudy M. Neonatal circumcision: associated factors and length of hospital stay. J Fam Pract. October 1995; 41(4): 370-6. PMID. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Protection_of_intact_newborns_in_hospital&oldid=33140"