Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Political attitutes towards MGM

1,134 bytes added, 10:44, 2 April 2020
Created page with "{{Construction Site}} While FGM is outlawed in almost every country, most countries still ignore, tolerate or accept MGM on minors. This is a classical bias situat..."
{{Construction Site}}
While [[FGM]] is outlawed in almost every country, most countries still ignore, tolerate or accept [[MGM]] on minors. This is a classical [[bias]] situation. Furthermore, every country worldwide punishes bodily harm. [[MGM]] on minors without any medical indication is bodily harm by definition.

{{Incomplete}}
This page tries to collect political attitutes and points of view on this topic. To begin with, we're collecting statements of political parties here.

== Norway ==
=== FrP ===
* 2017: Voted to ban the ritual circumcision of boys under the age of 16.<ref name="Independent2017">{{REFweb
|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/norwegian-ruling-progress-party-ban-circumcision-men-under-16-years-old-vote-annual-conference-a7723746.html
|title=Norwegian ruling party votes to ban circumcision for men under 16 years old
|last=Revesz
|first=Rachael
|publisher=Independent
|date=2017-05-08
|accessdate=2020-04-02
}}</ref>
* 2017: Voted to ban hijabs in public schools.<ref name="Independent2017"/>

{{REF}}

[[Category:Legislative initiative]]

[[de:Politische Einstellungen zu MGM]]
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,335
edits

Navigation menu