15,683
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Others Although Kirby (1994) suggested that the perceived sensitivity gains of the glans reported by some men are psychological, with glans sensitivity itself being unaffected.<ref>{{REFjournal |last=Kirby |first=R.S. |title=The Joy of Uncircumcising! Restore your birthright and maximize sexual pleasure |journal=BMJ |date=1994-09-10 |volume=309 |issue= |page=679 |url=http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/309/6955/679/a |quote= |pubmedID= |pubmedCID= |DOI=10.1136/bmj.309.6955.679a |accessdate=2019-9-29}}</ref> Sorrells (2007) ''et al'' and Yang ''et al'' (2008) have reported empirical data that it proves there is more sensation in intact males.<ref name="sorrels">{{REFjournal
}}</ref> It has been suggested that the perceived sensitivity gains of the glans reported by some men are psychological, with glans sensitivity itself being unaffected.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Kirby
|first=R.S.
|title=The Joy of Uncircumcising! Restore your birthright and maximize sexual pleasure
|journal=BMJ
|date=1994-09-10
|volume=309
|issue=
|page=679
|url=http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/309/6955/679/a
|quote=
|pubmedID=
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1136/bmj.309.6955.679a
|accessdate=2019-9-29
→Physical aspects: Revise text.
== Physical aspects ==
The natural foreskin has three principal components, in addition to blood vessels, nerves and connective tissue: [[skin]], which is exposed exteriorely; [[mucous membrane]], which is the inside surface in contact with the [[glans penis]] when the [[penis]] is flaccid; and a band layer of [[Dartos| muscle]] fibers under the foreskin. The [[ridged band]] is just inside the tip of the [[foreskin]].
Generally, the skin grows more readily in response to stretching than does the mucous membrane. The ring of muscle which normally holds the foreskin closed is completely removed in the majority of circumcisions and cannot be regrown, so the covering resulting from stretching techniques is usually looser than that of a natural foreskin. According to some observers it is difficult to distinguish a restored foreskin from a natural foreskin because restoration produces a "nearly normal-appearing prepuce."<ref name="Goodwin">{{REFjournal
}}</ref>
The process of foreskin restoration seeks to regenerate some of the tissue removed by circumcision by expansion of residual tissue, as well as providing coverage of the glans. According to research, the foreskin comprises over one-half of the skin and mucosa of the human penis.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Taylor
|first=J.R.
The work of Masters & Johnson (1966) has been shown to have severe methodological flaws that render their conclusions inaccurate and essentially useless. The work of Bleustein (2003) and Payne (2007) is similarly flawed by methodological faults.
|last=Sorrells
|first=
|date=2008-09-14
|accessdate=2019-09-30
}}</ref>