17,101
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Bias
,→Jewish influence on circumcision literature: Revise text.
=== Jewish influence on circumcision literature ===
Though American circumcision practice is generally believed to be independent of Jewish circumcision practice, they are connected; some of the most outspoken advocates for circumcision tend to be Jewish. The [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] has consistently disproportionately stuffed its "circumcision task forces" with Jewish doctors. It is believed that not a single member of an AAP Task Force on Circumcision has ever had a foreskin. This suggests a religious or cultural bias on the part of these advocates. Of course, there are also Jewish doctors that oppose circumcision, but they are disproportionately outnumbered by those who advocate circumcision. For example, of all the letters to the editor in response to the 1999 [[American Academy of Pediatrics ]] Circumcision Policy Statement, the most pro-circumcision responses were from Jewish doctors, including two whom also perform Jewish ritual circumcisions.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Bailis
|first=S.
|note=The presence of a large and influential population of Jewish physicians in this country...
|accessdate=2011-02-19
}}</ref> According to a MEDLINE search, the late [[Edgar J. Schoen]], a strong Jewish advocate, has been was published 20 times in the medical literature on the subject of circumcision.
==== Circumcision discourse and the Jewish presence ====