Changes

<p>After the release of the position statement, there was a substantial immediate critical comment by Brian Earp. * {{REFjournal |last=Earp |first=Brian |init=D. |author-link=Brian D. Earp |etal=no |title=The AAP report on circumcision: bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine |trans-title= |language=English |journal=Practical Ethics |location= |date=2012 |volume= |issue= |article= |page= |pages= |url=https://www.academia.edu/15617255/The_AAP_report_on_circumcision_bad_science_bad_ethics_bad_medicine |archived= |quote= |pubmedID= |pubmedCID= |DOI= |accessdate=2020-12-25}} Shorty thereafter a debate appeared in the journal ''Pediatrics'' and the ''Journal of Medical Ethics'' between the AAP and an ad-hoc group of Western doctors, ethicists and lawyers, who questioned the evidence and ethics of the AAP position statement, and accused the AAP of "cultural bias".