22,335
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
|trans-title=
|language=
|trans-title=
|language=English
|trans-title=
|language=
|trans-title=
|language=
adjusted REFjournal
This statement claimed for the first time that "potential medical benefits exist.<ref name="aap1999">{{REFjournal
|last=Schoen
|first=EdgarJ. |init=EJ
|author-link=Edgar J. Schoen
|last2=Anderson
|first2=Glenn
|init2=G
|author2-link=
|last3=Bohon
|first3=Constance
|init3=C
|author3-link=
|last4=Hinman
|first4=Frank
|init4=F
|author4-link=
|last5=Poland
|first5=Ronald
|init5=R
|author5-link=
|last6=Wakeman
|first6=E. Maurice
|init6=EM
|author6-link=
|etal=no
|title= Report of the Task Force of Circumcision. |trans-title= |language=
|journal=Pediatrics
|location=
The statement was not well received. Professor Ronald Poland, a member of the task force published a dissent in the ''New England Journal of Medicine''.<ref name="poland1990">{{REFjournal
|last=Poland
|first=Ronald L. |init=RL
|author-link=
|etal=no
|title=The question of routine neonatal circumcision
|journal=N Eng J Med
|location=
:The above sentence cited <u>Caring for Gravely Ill Children</u><ref name="Fleischmann 1994">{{REFjournal
|last=Fleischman
|firstinit=A.L.AL
|last2=Nolan
|first2init2=K.
|last3=Dubler
|first3init3=N..N.NN
|etal=yes
|date=1994
* {{REFjournal
|last=Earp
|first=BrianD. |init=D.BD
|author-link=Brian D. Earp
|etal=no
|title=The AAP report on circumcision: bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine
|journal=Practical Ethics
|location=
|last=Svoboda
|first=J. Steven
|init=JS
|author-link=J. Steven Svoboda
|last2=Van Howe
|first2=Robert S.
|init2=RS
|author2-link=Robert S. Van Howe
|etal=no
|title=Out of step: fatal flaws in the latest AAP policy report on neonatal circumcision
|journal=J Med Eth
|location=Published online first
|last=Frisch
|first=Morten
|init=M
|author-link=Morten Frisch
|last2=Aigrain
|first2=Yves
|init2=Y
|author2-link=
|last3=Barauskas
|first3=Vidmontas
|init3=V
|author3-link=
|etal=yes
|last=Darby
|first=Robert
|init=R
|author-link=Robert Darby
|etal=no
|title=Risks, Benefits, Complications and Harms: Neglected Factors in the Current Debate on Non-Therapeutic Circumcision
|journal=Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
|location=
|last=MacReady
|first=Norra
|init=N
|date=2010-07-03
|title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
|last=MacReady
|first=Norra
|init=N
|date=2010-07-03
|title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
|last=MacReady
|first=Norra
|init=N
|date=2010-07-03
|title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
|last=MacReady
|first=Norra
|init=N
|date=2010-07-03
|title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
|last=MacReady
|first=Norra
|init=N
|date=2010-07-03
|title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
|last=MacReady
|first=Norra
|init=N
|date=2010-07-03
|title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
|last=MacReady
|first=Norra
|init=N
|date=2010-07-03
|title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
|last=MacReady
|first=Norra
|init=N
|date=2010-07-03
|title=AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure
|last=Giannetti
|first=Matthew
|init=M
|author-link=
|title=Circumcision and the American Academy of Pediatrics: Should Scientific Misconduct Result in Trade Association Liability