Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Alleged reasons for circumcision

135 bytes removed, 20:04, 13 October 2021
m
wikify McDonald
* Paralysis of the bladder - 1875: [[Lewis Albert Sayre|Lewis A. Sayre]]<ref name="Sayre1875"/>
In 1958, [[C. Christine F. McDonald]] said "the same reasons that apply for the circumcision of males are generally valid when considered for the female."<ref name="McDonald1958">{{REFjournal |last=McDonald |init=CF |title=Circumcision of the female |journal=General Practitioner |date=1958-09 |volume=18 |issue=3 |pages=98-99McDonald1958}}</ref>
In 1966, Masters and Johnson erroneous claim that there is no difference in sensitivity between penises with and without foreskin.
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,208
edits

Navigation menu