Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

History of circumcision

56 bytes added, 11:57, 26 November 2021
m
REFbook uses <init> key
|last=Campbell
|first=M.F.
|init=MF
|year=1970
|title=Urology
|editors=M.F. Campbell & J.H. Harrison
|edition=3
|volume= 2
|chapter=The Male Genital Tract and the Female Urethra
|page=1836
|last=Hodges
|first=Frederick A.
|init=FA
|author-link=Frederick M. Hodges
|chapter=Short History of the Institutionalization of Involuntary Sexual Mutilation in the United States
|last=Ephron
|first=John M.
|init=JM
|year=2001
|title=Medicine and the German Jews
* 1966 Masters and Johnson erroneous claim that there is '''no difference in sensitivity between penises with and without [[foreskin]]'''.<br>(Note: Their work helps propagate the medical dogma that [[circumcision]] has no effect on sexuality go practically unquestioned for nearly the next four decades.)<ref>{{REFbook
|last=Masters and & Johnson
|year=1966
|title=Human Sexual Response
|location=Boston, MA
|publisher=Little Brown & Co.
}}</ref>
|last=Evanston
|first=Ill
|init=I
|year=1971
|title=Hospital Care of Newborn Infants
|last=Spock
|first=Benjamin
|init=B
|title=Baby and Child Care
|pages=1946-1976
|last=Ephron
|first=John M.
|init=JM
|author-link=
|year=2001
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,335
edits

Navigation menu