17,111
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Male circumcision: Add text and citations.
It may also be due to the influence of [[David R. Tomlinson]] who has invented several circumcision devices, including the [[AccuCirc]] which he merchandises. Tomlinson is the WHO adviser on circumcision, so he is unlikely to recommend against circumcision due to his apparent conflict-of interest.
The [[bias]] toward male circumcision may also come from the [[World_Health_Organization#Guideline_Development_Group_.28GDG.29| Guideline Development Group]], which is a large committee charged with the task of recommending "new guidelines on male circumcision". A survey of the committee revealed that it is overwhelmingly peopled with circumcision-biased individuals.
Large population-based surveys show that male circumcision has little or no effect on preventing HIV infection.
Mayan et al. (2021) carried out a massive empirical study of the male population of the province of Ontario, [[Canada]] (569,950 males), of whom 203,588 (35.7%) were circumcised between 1991 and 2017. The study concluded that circumcision status is not related to risk of [[HIV]] infection.<ref name="mayan2021">{{REFjournal
|last=Mayan
|first=Madhur
|init=
|author-link=
|last2=Hamilton
|first2=Robert J.
|init2=
|author2-link=
|last3=Juurlink
|first3=David N.
|init3=
|author3-link=
|last4=Austin
|first4=Peter C.
|init4=
|author4-link=
|last5=Jarvi
|first5=Keith A.
|init5=
|author5-link=
|etal=no
|title=Circumcision and Risk of HIV Among Males From Ontario, Canada
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=J Urol
|location=
|date=2021-09-23
|volume=
|issue=
|article=
|page=
|pages=
|url=https://www.auajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1097/JU.0000000000002234
|archived=
|quote=We found that circumcision was not independently associated with the risk of acquiring HIV among men from Ontario, Canada.
|pubmedID=34551593
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1097/JU.0000000000002234
|accessdate=2021-10-02
}}</ref> [[Morten Frisch]] and Jacob Simonsen (2021) carried out a large scale empirical population study in [[Denmark]] of 855,654 males regarding the alleged value of male circumcision in preventing [[HIV]] and other sexually transmitted infections in men. They found that circumcised men have a higher rate of STI and [[HIV]] infection overall than [[intact]] men.<ref name="frisch2021">{{REFjournal
|last=Frisch
|first=Morten
|init=
|author-link=Morten Frisch
|last2=Simonsen
|first2=Jacob
|init2=
|author2-link=
|etal=no
|title=Non-therapeutic male circumcision in infancy or childhood and risk of human immunodeficiency virus and other sexually transmitted infections: national cohort study in Denmark
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=Eur J Epidemiol
|location=
|date=2021-09-26
|volume=Published online ahead of print
|issue=
|article=
|page=
|pages=
|url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-021-00809-6
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=34564796
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1007/s10654-021-00809-6
|accessdate=2021-10-20
}}</ref>
Whatever the influences may be, Tedros has done nothing in his nearly five-years in office to reform the mess that he inherited when he took office, so the mutilation of boys and men by [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]] continues.
==Personal life==