Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Literature about foreskin restoration

315 bytes added, 20:30, 7 June 2022
m
Articles in popular press about foreskin restoration: Improve citation.
|quote=Though no one is keeping official statistics, the burgeoning Web presence of forums and chat groups, plus advocacy and information sites devoted to restoration, suggests that there are tens of thousands of men now at some stage of the procedure.
}} [[File:fs2301.pdf]] [[File:fs2302.pdf]] [[File:fs2303.pdf]] [[File:fs2304.pdf]] [[File:fs2305.pdf]]
# ''Time''. "[{{REFnews |title=The Great Uncircumcision Debate |url=http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1679981,00.html The Great Uncircumcision Debate]". Jeninne |last=Lee-St. John |first=Jeninne |init= |publisher=Time |website= |date=2007-11-02 |season= |accessdate=2022-06-07 |quote="Foreskin feels really good." So good, in fact, 2007that many restorers have also become "intactivists" who say involuntary circumcision of newborn males is cosmetic surgery and a civil rights violation. }} [[File:fs24.pdf]]
# ''Houston Press''. "[http://www.houstonpress.com/2007-07-12/news/the-fantastic-foreskin/full/ The Fantastic Foreskin]", Craig Malisow, 2007. (PDF larger than we can upload at the time)
# ''Chicago Tribune''. "[http://foreskin-restoration.net/archives/Circumspection-Chicago%20Tribune.htmCircumcision circumspection]". Judy Peres, 2007. [[File:fs26.pdf]]
17,052
edits

Navigation menu