Changes

* Foreskin restoration embarrasses and discredits the [[circumcision industry]] as it tries to make [[Financial incentive| as much money as it can]] from [[genital mutilation]] of boys.<ref name="bollinger2012">{{REFweb |url=https://www.academia.edu/6442587/High_Cost_of_Circumcision_3.6_Billion_Annually |title=High Cost of Circumcision: $3.6 Billion Annually |last=Bollinger |first=Dan |author-link=Dan Bollinger |publisher=Academia |website=https://www.academia.edu |date=2012 |accessdate=2024-06-21 |format= |quote=As the saying goes, follow the money. Now you know why neither the [[American Academy of Pediatrics]], American Medical Association, [[American Academy of Family Physicians]], or the [[American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]] haven’t condemned this unnecessary surgery, and why their physician members are quick to recommend the procedure to expectant parents.}}</ref>* Most of the development of non-surgical [[foreskin restoration]] has been done by non-medical organizations such as [[BUFF]].<ref>{{REFjournal |last=Özer |first= |init=M |author-link= |last2=Timmermans |first2= |init2=FW |author2-link= |etal=no |title=‘An insight into circumcised men seeking foreskin reconstruction: a prospective cohort study’ |trans-title= |language= |journal=Int J Impot Res |location= |date=2020-11 |volume=32 |issue=6 |pages=611-6 |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41443-019-0223-y |archived= |quote= |pubmedID=31896833 |pubmedCID= |DOI=10.1038/s41443-019-0223-y |accessdate=2024-06-19}}</ref>

[[Foreskin regeneration]] is a relatively new and experimental procedure with the application of the principles of tissue engineering to regeneration of missing foreskins, which [[Foregen]] is attempting to develop. The publications to date have been limited. The available articles report on the development of a procedure, not the actual performance of foreskin regeneration, which has not been done reported as of June 2024.