Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Bias

13 bytes added, 23:21, 27 September 2019
m
updated REFbook parameters
Although physicians may act with what they consider to be sound medical judgement, some Jewish physicians may be influenced also by non-medical consideration. Cultural background of many Jewish circumcision advocates predisposes them to view the practice in a positive light, to welcome evidence that the most particular and problematic religious custom of their people is medically beneficial, and to dismiss arguments to the contrary. The presence of a large and influential population of Jewish physicians in this country, their concentration in leading centers of research and publication, and their remarkably active participation in the century-long debate on circumcision seems too obvious and too significant to be rejected out of hand, or worse, to be avoided because it might be wrongly interpreted as gratuitous defamation.<ref>{{REFbook
| last=Glick | first=Leonard |author-link=Leonard Glick | year=2005 | title=Marked in Your Flesh, Jewish American Physicians and Twentieth-Century Circumcision Advocacy | url= | editor= | edition= | volume= | chapter="This Little Operation" | pages=183-184 | location=New York | publisher=Oxford University Press | isbn=0-19-517674-X | note=The presence of a large and influential population of Jewish physicians in this country... | accessdate=2011-02-19
}}</ref> According to a MEDLINE search, Edgar Schoen, a strong Jewish advocate, has been published 20 times in the medical literature on the subject of circumcision.
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,335
edits

Navigation menu