Difference between revisions of "George Hill"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Revise text.) |
m (adjusted REFjournal) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|last=Hill | |last=Hill | ||
|first=George | |first=George | ||
| + | |init=G | ||
|author-link=George Hill | |author-link=George Hill | ||
|title=Can anyone authorize the nontherapeutic permanent alteration of a child's body? | |title=Can anyone authorize the nontherapeutic permanent alteration of a child's body? | ||
| Line 56: | Line 57: | ||
|last=Hill | |last=Hill | ||
|first=George | |first=George | ||
| + | |init=G | ||
|author-link=George Hill | |author-link=George Hill | ||
|last2=Geisheker | |last2=Geisheker | ||
|first2=John V. | |first2=John V. | ||
| + | |init2=JV | ||
|author2-link=John V. Geisheker | |author2-link=John V. Geisheker | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
| Line 78: | Line 81: | ||
|last=Hill | |last=Hill | ||
|first=George | |first=George | ||
| + | |init=G | ||
|author-link=George Hill | |author-link=George Hill | ||
|title=The case against circumcision | |title=The case against circumcision | ||
| Line 94: | Line 98: | ||
* {{REFjournal | * {{REFjournal | ||
|last=Denniston | |last=Denniston | ||
| − | |first=George | + | |first=George C. |
| + | |init=GC | ||
|author-link=George C. Denniston | |author-link=George C. Denniston | ||
|last2=Hill | |last2=Hill | ||
|first2=George | |first2=George | ||
| + | |init2=G | ||
|author2-link=George Hill | |author2-link=George Hill | ||
|title=Gairdner was wrong | |title=Gairdner was wrong | ||
| Line 115: | Line 121: | ||
|last=Boyle | |last=Boyle | ||
|first=Gregory J. | |first=Gregory J. | ||
| + | |init=GJ | ||
|author-link=Gregory Boyle | |author-link=Gregory Boyle | ||
|first2=George | |first2=George | ||
|last2=Hill | |last2=Hill | ||
| + | |init2=G | ||
|author2-link=George Hill | |author2-link=George Hill | ||
|title=Sub-Saharan African randomised clinical trials into male circumcision and HIV transmission: Methodological, ethical and legal concerns | |title=Sub-Saharan African randomised clinical trials into male circumcision and HIV transmission: Methodological, ethical and legal concerns | ||
Revision as of 18:44, 29 December 2020
George Hill is the Vice-President for Medical Science and Bioethics of Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.), and its prolific scribe. George joined DOC in 1997 and swiftly became a highly productive advocate. He has to his credit several published articles and letter-briefs questioning circumcision. He has kept up a lively correspondence with the American Academy of Pediatrics, the CDC, and state Medicaid agencies nationwide. He was the author of the original Doctors Opposing Circumcision Genital Integrity Policy Statement,[1] the framework for the new D.O.C. website.[2]
Publications
Hill G. Can anyone authorize the nontherapeutic permanent alteration of a child's body?. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2003; 3(2) PMID. DOI. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
Hill, George (29 August 2004). The Holy Bible, circumcision, false prophets, and Christian parents
, CIRP. Retrieved 28 September 2019.- Hill G, Geisheker JV. Edgar Schoen does not represent the North American view of male circumcision. Arch Dis Child. January 2006; 91(1): 92. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 23 October 2019.
- Hill G. The case against circumcision. Journal of Men's Health and Gender. 2007; 4(3): 318-323. Retrieved 26 September 2019.
- Denniston GC, Hill G. Gairdner was wrong. Can Fam Physician. October 2010; 56(10): 986-7. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 28 September 2019.
- Boyle GJ, Hill G. Sub-Saharan African randomised clinical trials into male circumcision and HIV transmission: Methodological, ethical and legal concerns. Thompson Reuter. 2011; Retrieved 25 September 2019.
- Hill, George (27 May 2012).
Circumcision and human behavior: The emotional and behavioral effects of circumcision.
, Wordpress. Retrieved 27 September 2019.
References
- ↑
Hill, George: Genital Integrity Policy Statement 
, Doctors Opposing Circumcision. (2008). Retrieved 19 September 2019.
- ↑ (2019).
Board of Directors and Advisors
, Doctors Opposing Circumcision. Retrieved 18 September 2019.
.svg){kind=icon}
