Difference between revisions of "Intact-friendly doctors list"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Revise text; Wikify; Add categories.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Construction Site}} | {{Construction Site}} | ||
| − | The general ignorance of the human [[foreskin]] in the American medical community and the prevailing poor quality of care provided to [[foreskinned]] boys has led to the creation of the '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}'''. | + | The general ignorance of the human [[foreskin]] in the American medical community and the resultant prevailing poor quality of care provided to [[foreskinned]] boys has led to the creation of the '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}'''. |
| − | The '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is maintained on the website of [[Your Whole Baby]]. The names of intact-friendly doctors | + | The '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is maintained on the website of [[Your Whole Baby]]. The names of intact-friendly doctors are provided by parents who had a good experience with a doctor. |
The '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' may be accessed at [https://www.yourwholebaby.org/doctors Intact-friendly doctors list]. | The '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' may be accessed at [https://www.yourwholebaby.org/doctors Intact-friendly doctors list]. | ||
| − | According to Doctors Opposing Circumcision, such physicians: | + | According to [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.) |Doctors Opposing Circumcision]], such physicians: |
| − | * respect the natural developmental process of the [[foreskin]], and its variability. They know not to hurry the process nor worry about normal variations like [[ | + | * respect the natural developmental process of the [[foreskin]], and its variability. They know not to hurry the process nor worry about normal variations like [[Ballooning of the foreskin| ballooning]], [[smegma]], etc. |
* know that the average age for full retractability of the [[foreskin]] is about age 10,<ref name="Thorvaldsen">{{REFjournal | * know that the average age for full retractability of the [[foreskin]] is about age 10,<ref name="Thorvaldsen">{{REFjournal | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
* Should foreskin or urinary tract problems occur, they use non-invasive treatments, make every effort to preserve and protect genital wholeness, and know that [[circumcision]] of children is rarely, if ever, needed. | * Should foreskin or urinary tract problems occur, they use non-invasive treatments, make every effort to preserve and protect genital wholeness, and know that [[circumcision]] of children is rarely, if ever, needed. | ||
| − | {{REF} | + | {{REF}} |
Revision as of 19:38, 6 May 2023
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
The general ignorance of the human foreskin in the American medical community and the resultant prevailing poor quality of care provided to foreskinned boys has led to the creation of the Intact-friendly doctors list.
The Intact-friendly doctors list is maintained on the website of Your Whole Baby. The names of intact-friendly doctors are provided by parents who had a good experience with a doctor.
The Intact-friendly doctors list may be accessed at Intact-friendly doctors list.
According to Doctors Opposing Circumcision, such physicians:
- respect the natural developmental process of the foreskin, and its variability. They know not to hurry the process nor worry about normal variations like ballooning, smegma, etc.
- know that the average age for full retractability of the foreskin is about age 10,[1] and that it is completely normal for some boys not to be retractable until after puberty.
- know that forcible retraction of the foreskin is harmful, and that it is not necessary for cleaning, examination, or catheterization.
- know that foreskin care in the young child is very simple: “Only clean what is seen” and “Leave it alone!”
- Should foreskin or urinary tract problems occur, they use non-invasive treatments, make every effort to preserve and protect genital wholeness, and know that circumcision of children is rarely, if ever, needed.
References
- ↑
Thorvaldsen MA, Meyhoff H. Patologisk eller fysiologisk fimose? [Pathological or physiological phimosis?] (Danish). Ugeskr Læger. 2005; 167(17): 1858-1862. Retrieved 6 May 2023.
