South Korea: Difference between revisions

WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m formattings
No edit summary
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Flag_of_South_Korea.svg|thumb|150px|Flag of South Korea]]
[[File:Flag_of_South_Korea.svg|thumb|150px|Flag of South Korea]]
'''South Korea''', a traditionally non-circumcising nation, nevertheless, adopted the practice of non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] during and after the Korean War (1950-53). The adoption of [[circumcision]] may be traced to 1950, when the [[United States]] intervened in the Korean War and large numbers of mostly [[circumcised]] American troops were sent into South Korea to aid in its defense.<ref name="kim1999">{{REFjournal
'''South Korea''', a traditionally non-circumcising nation, nevertheless, adopted the practice of non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] during and after the Korean War (1950-53). The adoption of [[circumcision]] may be traced to 1950, when the [[United States]], which was then a nation devoted to circumcision, intervened in the Korean War (1950-53) and large numbers of mostly [[circumcised]] American troops, attended by mostly [[circumcised doctors]] in the American medical corps, were sent into South Korea to aid in its defense.<ref name="kim1999">{{REFjournal
  |last=Kim
  |last=Kim
  |first=DaiSik
  |first=Dai Sik
  |init=DS
  |init=DS
  |author-link=DaiSik Kim
  |author-link=Dai Sik Kim
  |last2=Lee
  |last2=Lee
  |first2=
  |first2=
Line 46: Line 46:
  |quote=
  |quote=
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
A 1971 study of men who were being examined for military service found that only five percent of the men were [[circumcised]]. These men must have been born just before or during the Korean War, but were not [[circumcised]], so this indicates that the onset of non-therapeutic circumcision is of more recent vintage.<ref>{{REFjournal
A 1971 study of South Korean men who were being examined for military service found that only five percent of the men were [[circumcised]]. These men must have been born just before or during the Korean War, but were not [[circumcised]], so this indicates that the onset of non-therapeutic circumcision is of more recent vintage.<ref>{{REFjournal
  |last=Jung
  |last=Jung
  |init=KM
  |init=KM
Line 69: Line 69:
===Usual age for circumcision===
===Usual age for circumcision===


Most Korean males are [[circumcised]] not in infancy but at puberty, as teenagers or in their 20s, so it is now viewed as a "rite of passage".  [[Circumcision]] in infancy is rare in South Korea.<ref name="kim1999" /> Ku ''et al''. (2003) reported "a positive attitude toward circumcision in South Korean men, linking it with hygienic practices." They also reported the decision to circumcise was most often made by parents.<ref name="ku2003">{{REFjournal
Most Korean males are [[circumcised]] not in infancy but at [[puberty]], as teenagers or in their 20s, so it is now viewed as a "rite of passage".  [[Circumcision]] in infancy is rare in South Korea.<ref name="kim1999" /> Ku ''et al''. (2003) reported "a positive attitude toward circumcision in South Korean men, linking it with hygienic practices." They also reported the decision to circumcise was most often made by parents.<ref name="ku2003">{{REFjournal
  |last=Ku
  |last=Ku
  |first=
  |first=
Line 130: Line 130:
  |author-link=
  |author-link=
  |last2=Kim
  |last2=Kim
  |first2=
  |first2=Dai Sik
  |init2=DS
  |init2=DS
  |author2-link=DaiSik Kim
  |author2-link=Dai Sik Kim
  |etal=no
  |etal=no
  |title=Extraordinarily high rates of male circumcision in South Korea: history and underlying causes
  |title=Extraordinarily high rates of male circumcision in South Korea: history and underlying causes
Line 166: Line 166:
===Reports from medical doctors===
===Reports from medical doctors===


Of the doctors surveyed, 41 percent performed circumcisions. General surgeons and urologists were most likely to perform circumcisions. Unlike America, only 28 percent of obstetricians did circumcisions and no paediatricians performed circumcisions. Doctors generally were poorly informed about circumcision.<ref name="pang2002" />
Of the doctors surveyed, 41 percent performed circumcisions. General surgeons and urologists were most likely to perform circumcisions. Unlike America, only 28 percent of obstetricians did circumcisions and no paediatricians performed circumcisions. Doctors generally were poorly informed about [[circumcision]].<ref name="pang2002" />


==Medical research==
==Medical research==


Kim & Pang (2007) studied the effect of the [[foreskin]] on [[masturbation]]. They reported that masturbatory pleasure decreased in 48% of the respondents and increased in 8%, while difficulty increased in 63% but was easier in 37%. They concluded that there was a decrease in masturbatory pleasure after [[adult circumcision| circumcision]].<ref name="kimpang2007">{{REFjournal
Kim & Pang (2007) studied the effect of the [[foreskin]] on [[masturbation]]. They reported that masturbatory pleasure decreased in 48% of the respondents and increased in 8%, while difficulty increased in 63% but was easier in 37%. They concluded that there was a decrease in masturbatory pleasure after [[adult circumcision| circumcision]].<ref name="kimpang2007">{{KimDS PangMG 2007}}</ref>
|last=Kim
|first=DaiSik
|init=DS
|author-link=DaiSik Kim
|last2=Pang
|first2=Myung-Geol
|init2=MG
|title=The effect of male circumcision on sexuality
|journal=BJU Int
|volume=99
|issue=3
|pages=619-622
|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06646.x
|quote=
|pubmedID=17155977
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06646.x
|date=2007-03
|accessdate=2021-06-06
}}</ref>


==Declining rate of male circumcision reported==
==Declining rate of male circumcision reported==
Line 196: Line 176:
Kim et al. (2012) reported a new survey carried out in 2010-11 that found a sharp decline in the incidence of circumcision. The circumcision rate in the age 14–16 age group had declined over a decade from 88.4% to 56.4%. The circumcision rate in the 17–19 age group Had declined from 95.2% to 74.4%. The authors attributed the decline to the availability of better information on male non-therapeutic circumcision. The authors suggested that the practice of male circumcision is in steep decline in South Korea.<ref name="kim2012">{{REFjournal
Kim et al. (2012) reported a new survey carried out in 2010-11 that found a sharp decline in the incidence of circumcision. The circumcision rate in the age 14–16 age group had declined over a decade from 88.4% to 56.4%. The circumcision rate in the 17–19 age group Had declined from 95.2% to 74.4%. The authors attributed the decline to the availability of better information on male non-therapeutic circumcision. The authors suggested that the practice of male circumcision is in steep decline in South Korea.<ref name="kim2012">{{REFjournal
  |last=Kim
  |last=Kim
  |first=DaiSik
  |first=Dai Sik
  |init=DS
  |init=DS
  |author-link=DaiSik Kim
  |author-link=Dai Sik Kim
  |last2=Koo
  |last2=Koo
  |first2=Sung-Ae
  |first2=Sung-Ae
Line 226: Line 206:
  |DOI=10.1186/1471-2458-12-1067
  |DOI=10.1186/1471-2458-12-1067
  |accessdate=2012-01
  |accessdate=2012-01
}}</ref>
The percentage of males [[circumcised]] in South Korea (prevalence) is reported to be 77%.<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://circstatistics.github.io/
|title=Global Circumcision Statistics and Estimates
|last=
|first=
|init=
|publisher=https://circstatistics.github.io
|date=2024-04-01
|accessdate=2024-04-01
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Line 298: Line 289:


{{SEEALSO}}
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Dai Sik Kim]]
* [[Foreskin restoration information for circumcised teens]]
* [[Intact South Korea]]
* [[Intact South Korea]]
* [[Human rights]]
* [[Human rights]]


{{REF}}
{{REF}}
[[Category:Male circumcision]]
[[Category:Country]]
[[Category:Human rights]]


[[Category:Korea]]
[[Category:Korea]]
[[Category:Human rights]]