Difference between revisions of "British royal family circumcision legend"
m (added subtitles and category) |
WikiModEn11 (talk | contribs) (→Investigation: George was still king in 1948) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
Although this long standing legend cannot be proved to be true, it was generally believed to be true. It is probable therefore, that many parents had their sons circumcised because the royal family was believed to do it. | Although this long standing legend cannot be proved to be true, it was generally believed to be true. It is probable therefore, that many parents had their sons circumcised because the royal family was believed to do it. | ||
| − | Non-therapeutic circumcision of children was still a recognised medical practice in 1948 when Prince Charles was born. There is some evidence that Prince Charles was non-ritually circumcised in 1948 by Dr [[Jacob Snowman]], a Jewish [[mohel]], not by any royal tradition, but by order of his | + | Non-therapeutic circumcision of children was still a recognised medical practice in 1948 when Prince Charles was born. There is some evidence that Prince Charles was non-ritually circumcised in 1948 by Dr [[Jacob Snowman]], a Jewish [[mohel]], not by any royal tradition, but by order of his grandfather, King George, who was the head of the Anglican Church. |
| + | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
| + | * [[United Kingdom]] | ||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:35, 14 November 2023
There is a long-standing British royal family circumcision legend about the royal family and its alleged practice of male circumcision that has long been circulated in the print media and orally.
Contents
Legend
According to the legend, Queen Victoria believed that she was descended from the Jewish King David of the Bible. She had her sons circumcised in accordance with Jewish practice. After Queen Victoria's death succeeding generations of the royal family continued the practice.
Investigation
Robert Darby and John Cozijn thoroughly investigated the legend and were unable to verify any of it. Moreover, they showed evidence that it cannot be true.[1]
Although this long standing legend cannot be proved to be true, it was generally believed to be true. It is probable therefore, that many parents had their sons circumcised because the royal family was believed to do it.
Non-therapeutic circumcision of children was still a recognised medical practice in 1948 when Prince Charles was born. There is some evidence that Prince Charles was non-ritually circumcised in 1948 by Dr Jacob Snowman, a Jewish mohel, not by any royal tradition, but by order of his grandfather, King George, who was the head of the Anglican Church.
See also
References
- ↑
Darby, Robert, Cozijn, John. The British Royal Family’s Circumcision Tradition: Genesis and Evolution of a Contemporary Legend. Sage. 13 October 2013; DOI. Retrieved 4 September 2021.
