Difference between revisions of "Donald C. Snyder"
m (using USSC) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add links in SEEALSO section.) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Circumcision promotion == | == Circumcision promotion == | ||
| − | In 1953, he and [[Richard L. Miller]] published an influential paper in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, calling for the [[Routine Infant Circumcision|immediate circumcision of all males straight after birth]]. Ignoring [[Douglas Gairdner|Gairdner]] and relying heavily on the writings of [[Abraham L. Wolbarst|Wolbarst]], they insisted that “[[phimosis]]” required immediate surgical correction, and asserted that [[circumcision]] would “reduce the incidence of [[masturbation|onanism]]”, heighten male libido and “increase longevity and immunity to nearly all physical and mental illness.” | + | In 1953, he and [[Richard L. Miller]] published an influential paper in the ''American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology'', calling for the [[Routine Infant Circumcision|immediate circumcision of all males straight after birth]]. Ignoring [[Douglas Gairdner|Gairdner]] and relying heavily on the writings of [[Abraham L. Wolbarst|Wolbarst]], they insisted that “[[phimosis]]” required immediate surgical correction, and asserted that [[circumcision]] would “reduce the incidence of [[masturbation|onanism]]”, heighten male libido and “increase longevity and immunity to nearly all physical and mental illness.” |
They also stated that [[circumcision]] immediately after birth was convenient for the doctor and in the financial best interests of the hospital. Leading obstetrical textbooks were soon rewritten to include Miller and Snyder’s recommendations. | They also stated that [[circumcision]] immediately after birth was convenient for the doctor and in the financial best interests of the hospital. Leading obstetrical textbooks were soon rewritten to include Miller and Snyder’s recommendations. | ||
| + | ==Contraindications== | ||
| + | Spence (1970) carried out a large scale study regardig immediate circumcision after birth. They study found that holding the newborn infant in the delivery room for circumcision resulted in chilling of the infant.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
| + | |last=Spence | ||
| + | |first=George R. | ||
| + | |init= | ||
| + | |author-link= | ||
| + | |etal=no | ||
| + | |title=Chilling of newborn infants: its relation to circumcision immediately following birth | ||
| + | |trans-title= | ||
| + | |language= | ||
| + | |journal=South Med J | ||
| + | |location= | ||
| + | |date=1970-03 | ||
| + | |season= | ||
| + | |volume=63 | ||
| + | |issue=3 | ||
| + | |article= | ||
| + | |page= | ||
| + | |pages=309-11 | ||
| + | |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/complications/spence1/ | ||
| + | |archived= | ||
| + | |quote= | ||
| + | |pubmedID=5415184 | ||
| + | |pubmedCID= | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1097/00007611-197003000-00014 | ||
| + | |accessdate=2022/07/21 | ||
| + | }}</ref>The practice of immediate circumcision after birth appears to have fallen into disrepute and may no longer be practiced. | ||
{{PUB}} | {{PUB}} | ||
* {{MillerSnyder1953}} | * {{MillerSnyder1953}} | ||
| + | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
| + | * [[Alleged reasons for circumcision]] | ||
| + | * [[Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the Hospital]] | ||
| + | * [[Circumcision]] | ||
| + | * [[Human rights]] | ||
| + | * [[Intactivism]] | ||
| + | * [[United States of America]] | ||
| + | * [[Your Whole Baby]] | ||
{{ABBR}} | {{ABBR}} | ||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
| Line 21: | Line 56: | ||
[[Category:Physician]] | [[Category:Physician]] | ||
[[Category:Promoter]] | [[Category:Promoter]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Author]] | ||
[[Category:USA]] | [[Category:USA]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:19, 9 May 2024
Donald C. Snyder, M.D.[a 1], from Acron, OH, was an obstetrician.
Contents
Circumcision promotion
In 1953, he and Richard L. Miller published an influential paper in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, calling for the immediate circumcision of all males straight after birth. Ignoring Gairdner and relying heavily on the writings of Wolbarst, they insisted that “phimosis” required immediate surgical correction, and asserted that circumcision would “reduce the incidence of onanism”, heighten male libido and “increase longevity and immunity to nearly all physical and mental illness.”
They also stated that circumcision immediately after birth was convenient for the doctor and in the financial best interests of the hospital. Leading obstetrical textbooks were soon rewritten to include Miller and Snyder’s recommendations.
Contraindications
Spence (1970) carried out a large scale study regardig immediate circumcision after birth. They study found that holding the newborn infant in the delivery room for circumcision resulted in chilling of the infant.[1]The practice of immediate circumcision after birth appears to have fallen into disrepute and may no longer be practiced.
Publications
Miller RL, Snyder DC. Immediate circumcision of the newborn male. AJOG. January 1953; 6(1): 1-11. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 13 October 2021.
See also
- Alleged reasons for circumcision
- Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the Hospital
- Circumcision
- Human rights
- Intactivism
- United States of America
- Your Whole Baby
Abbreviations
- ↑
Doctor of Medicine
, Wikipedia. Retrieved 14 June 2021. In the United Kingdom, Ireland and some Commonwealth countries, the abbreviation MD is common.
References
- ↑ Spence, George R.. Chilling of newborn infants: its relation to circumcision immediately following birth. South Med J. March 1970; 63(3): 309-11. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 21 July 2022.