Difference between revisions of "Intactness"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Create page.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add text and Wikify.) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a noun that means | |
| − | '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a noun that means | + | # the condition of being [[intact]], |
| + | # the state of being unimpaired, and | ||
| + | # completeness.<ref>{{REFweb | ||
|url=https://www.wordnik.com/words/intactness | |url=https://www.wordnik.com/words/intactness | ||
|title=Intactness | |title=Intactness | ||
| Line 11: | Line 13: | ||
}} | }} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Among English-speaking nations, '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the norm in [[Australia]], [[Canada]], [[New Zealand]], and the [[United Kingdom]];<ref name="stat2016">{{REFweb | ||
| + | |url=https://circstatistics.github.io/ | ||
| + | |title=Global Circumcision Statistics and Estimates | ||
| + | |publisher=https://circstatistics.github.io | ||
| + | |date=2024-04-01 | ||
| + | |accessdate=2024-05-05 | ||
| + | }}</ref> and is transitioning to the norm in the [[United States]].<ref name="jacobson2021">{{REFjournal | ||
| + | |last=Jacobson | ||
| + | |first=Deborah L. | ||
| + | |init= | ||
| + | |author-link= | ||
| + | |last2=Balmert | ||
| + | |first2=Lauren C. | ||
| + | |init2= | ||
| + | |author2-link= | ||
| + | |last3=Holl | ||
| + | |first3=Jane L. | ||
| + | |init3= | ||
| + | |author3-link= | ||
| + | |last4=Rosoklija | ||
| + | |first4=Ilina | ||
| + | |init4= | ||
| + | |author4-link= | ||
| + | |last5=Davis | ||
| + | |first5=Matthew M. | ||
| + | |init5= | ||
| + | |author5-link= | ||
| + | |last6=Johnson | ||
| + | |first6Emilie K. | ||
| + | |init6= | ||
| + | |author6-link= | ||
| + | |etal=no | ||
| + | |title=Nationwide Circumcision Trends: 2003 to 2016 | ||
| + | |trans-title= | ||
| + | |language= | ||
| + | |journal=J Urol | ||
| + | |location= | ||
| + | |date=2021-01 | ||
| + | |volume=205 | ||
| + | |issue=1 | ||
| + | |article= | ||
| + | |pages=257-63 | ||
| + | |url=https://www.auajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1097/JU.0000000000001316 | ||
| + | |pubmedID=32716676 | ||
| + | |pubmedCID= | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1097/JU.0000000000001316 | ||
| + | |accessdate=2024-05-05 | ||
| + | }}</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the norm in all European nations, all Latin American nations, [[China]], [[India]], and Mongolia.<ref name="stat2016" /> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Unfortunately, '''intactness''' has been shamed in the [[United States]] and American males have been discouraged from keeping their erogenous, protective, and healthy [[foreskin],<ref name="garrett2023-12-21">{{REFweb | ||
| + | |url=https://intactamerica.org/foreskin-phobia-intact-penis-shamed/ | ||
| + | |title=Foreskin Phobia: How The Intact Penis Has Been Shamed | ||
| + | |last=Garrett | ||
| + | |first=Connor | ||
| + | |init= | ||
| + | |author-link=Connor Judson Garrett | ||
| + | |publisher=Intact America | ||
| + | |date=2023-12-21 | ||
| + | |accessdate=2024-05-15 | ||
| + | }}</ref> but increasing levels of intactness are now being reported among newborn infant boys.<ref name="jacobson2021" /> | ||
| + | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
| + | * {{REFweb | ||
| + | |url=https://peacefulbeginningsrosemary.wordpress.com/circ-information/having-a-foreskin/ | ||
| + | |title=Having a Foreskin | ||
| + | |last=Anonymous | ||
| + | |first= | ||
| + | |init= | ||
| + | |publisher=Peaceful Beginnings | ||
| + | |date=2012-07-17 | ||
| + | |accessdate=2024-05-05 | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
| + | [[Category:Education]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Statistics]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Term]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:34, 9 July 2024
Intactness is a noun that means
Among English-speaking nations, Intactness is the norm in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom;[2] and is transitioning to the norm in the United States.[3]
Intactness is the norm in all European nations, all Latin American nations, China, India, and Mongolia.[2]
Unfortunately, intactness has been shamed in the United States and American males have been discouraged from keeping their erogenous, protective, and healthy [[foreskin],[4] but increasing levels of intactness are now being reported among newborn infant boys.[3]
See also
Anonymous (17 July 2012). Having a Foreskin
, Peaceful Beginnings. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
References
- ↑ Anonymous.
Intactness
, Wordnik. Retrieved 12 April 2024. - ↑ a b (1 April 2024).
Global Circumcision Statistics and Estimates
, https://circstatistics.github.io. Retrieved 5 May 2024. - ↑ a b
Jacobson, Deborah L., Balmert, Lauren C., Holl, Jane L., Rosoklija, Ilina, Davis, Matthew M., Johnson. Nationwide Circumcision Trends: 2003 to 2016. J Urol. January 2021; 205(1): 257-63. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
- ↑ Garrett, Connor (21 December 2023).
Foreskin Phobia: How The Intact Penis Has Been Shamed
, Intact America. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
