Murray Katz: Difference between revisions

WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m replace <coauthors> parameter
Add link in SEEALSO section; Wikify.
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{| class="infobox vcard" style="190px; font-size:90%" border="0" cellspacing="4" align="right"
{| class="infobox vcard" style="190px; font-size:90%" border="0" cellspacing="4" align="right"
|-  
|-  
| align="right" | [[Image:Murraykatz.jpg|190px|right|thumb|Murray Katz]]
| align="right" | [[Image:Murraykatz.jpg|190px|center]]
|-
| align="center" | [[{{FULLPAGENAME}}]]
|-
|- style="background: #DCDCDC"
|- style="background: #DCDCDC"
| align="center" | '''Colleagues & Benefactors:'''
| align="center" | '''Colleagues & benefactors:'''
|-
|-
| align="center" | [[Neil Pollock]]<br>[[Pierre Crouse]]<br>
| align="center" | [[Neil Pollock]]<br>[[Pierre Crouse]]<br>
Line 9: Line 12:
|}
|}


'''Murray Katz''' is a doctor whose primary business is the circumcision of children.
'''Murray Katz''' is a [[Circumcised doctors| circumcised doctor]] whose primary business is the [[circumcision]] of children.
 
The [[Canadian Urological Association]] says "neonatal circumcision cannot be justified based
on the current evidence available."<ref name="cua2018">{{REFjournal
|last=Dave
|first=Sumit
|init=S
|author-link=
|last2=Afshar
|first2=Kourash
|init2=K
|author2-link=
|last3=Braga
|first3=Luis
|init3=L
|author3-link=
|last4=Anderson
|first4=Peter
|init4=P
|author4-link=
|etal=no
|title=Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version)
|journal=Can Urol Assoc J
|location=
|date=2018-02
|volume=12
|issue=2
|pages=E76-99
|url=http://www.cua.org/themes/web/assets/files/5033_foreskin_guideline_longversion.pdf
|pubmedID=29381458
|pubmedCID=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc5937400/
|DOI=/10.5489/cuaj.5033
|accessdate=2020-07-07
}}</ref>


== Innovative technique ==
== Innovative technique ==


According to the National Post, Murray Katz collaborated with [[Neil Pollock]] on creating a so-called "new and innovative technique" for circumcision.<ref>{{REFnews
According to the ''National Post'', Murray Katz collaborated with [[Neil Pollock]] on creating a so-called "new and innovative technique" for [[circumcision]].<ref>{{REFnews
  |last=Owens
  |last=Owens
  |first=Anne Marie
  |first=Anne Marie
Line 21: Line 57:
  |work=National Post
  |work=National Post
  |quote=Dr. Neil Pollock, a Vancouver-area physician who is also a trained mohel designated to perform ritual Jewish circumcisions, has pioneered a technique with Dr. Murray Katz of Montreal using a four-step approach to pain relief and a piece of equipment that allows for a much quicker operation.
  |quote=Dr. Neil Pollock, a Vancouver-area physician who is also a trained mohel designated to perform ritual Jewish circumcisions, has pioneered a technique with Dr. Murray Katz of Montreal using a four-step approach to pain relief and a piece of equipment that allows for a much quicker operation.
  |date=22 Jan 2001
  |date=2001-01-22
  |accessdate=2012-10-07
  |accessdate=2012-10-07
}}</ref> On his website, however, Neil Pollock doesn't seem to offer Katz much credit, and takes most of it for himself.<ref>{{REFweb
}}</ref> On his website, however, Neil Pollock doesn't seem to offer Katz much credit, and takes most of it for himself.<ref>{{REFweb
Line 45: Line 81:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Closer inspection reveals that Pollock and Katz aren't doing anything "new"; on his website, Pollock reveals that he uses the Mogen technique, which involves the [[Mogen]] clamp.<ref>{{REFweb
Closer inspection reveals that Pollock and Katz aren't doing anything "new"; on his website, Pollock reveals that he uses the Mogen technique,<ref name="kaweblum1984">{{REFjournal
|last=Kaweblum
|first=Yosef
|init=Y
|author-link=
|last2=Press
|first2=Shirley
|init2=S
|author2-link=
|last3=Kogan
|first3=Leib
|init3=L
|author3-link=
|title=Circumcision using the mogen clamp
|journal=Clin Pediatr (Phila.)
|location=
|date=1984-12
|volume=23
|issue=
|pages=679-82
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/procedure/mogen/
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=6499347
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1177/000992288402301204
|accessdate=2020-08-06
}}</ref> which involves the [[Mogen]] clamp.<ref>{{REFweb
  |quote=The technique used by Dr. Pollock is called the Mogen technique.
  |quote=The technique used by Dr. Pollock is called the Mogen technique.
  |url=http://www.pollockclinics.com/circumcision/circumcision-guide.html
  |url=http://www.pollockclinics.com/circumcision/circumcision-guide.html
Line 82: Line 145:
  |last=Taeusch
  |last=Taeusch
  |first=H. William
  |first=H. William
|init=HW
|last2=Martinez
  |first2=Alma M.
  |first2=Alma M.
  |last2=Martinez
  |init2=AM
|last3=Partridge
  |first3=J. Colin
  |first3=J. Colin
  |last3=Partridge
  |init3=JC
|last4=Sniderman
  |first4=Susan
  |first4=Susan
  |last4=Sniderman
  |init4=S
|last5=Armstrong-Wells
  |first5=Jennifer
  |first5=Jennifer
  |last5=Armstrong-Wells
  |init5=J
|last6=Fuentes-Afflick
  |first6=Elena
  |first6=Elena
  |last6=Fuentes-Afflick
  |init6=E
  |title=Pain During Mogen or PlastiBell Circumcision
  |title=Pain During Mogen or Plastibell Circumcision
  |journal=Journal of Perinatology
  |journal=Journal of Perinatology
  |volume=22
  |volume=22
Line 102: Line 171:
  |pubmedCID=
  |pubmedCID=
  |DOI=
  |DOI=
  |date=April/May 2002
  |date=2002-04
|note=April/May 2002
  |accessdate=2011-04-08
  |accessdate=2011-04-08
}}</ref> Mogen went out of business<ref>{{REFnews
}}</ref> Mogen went out of business<ref name="tagami2011">{{REFnews
  |last=Tagami
  |last=Tagami
  |first=Ty
  |first=Ty
Line 114: Line 184:
  |date=2010-07-19
  |date=2010-07-19
  |accessdate=2011-04-08
  |accessdate=2011-04-08
}}</ref> after losing a 10.8 million dollar law suit,<ref>{{REFnews
}}</ref> after losing a 10.8 million dollar law suit,<ref name="tagami2011"/> after a mohel<ref name="tagami2011"/> using one of their clamps. Mogen claimed that injury was impossible with its use.<ref name="tagami2011"/> The injury behind a prior lawsuit in Fulton County Superior Court had already put Mogen on notice about the danger of the device.<ref name="tagami2011"/>
|last=Tagami
 
|first=Ty
In a different case, at South Fulton Medical Center, another law suit was won in 2009.<ref name="tagami2011"/> In that case, a child lost a third of his glans, and the plaintiffs were awarded 2.3 million dollars.<ref name="tagami2011"/>
|url=http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/atlanta-lawyer-wins-11-573890.html
 
|title=Atlanta lawyer wins $11 million lawsuit for family in botched circumcision
==Lack of third-party payment==
|publisher=
 
|work=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
[[Third-party payment]] for non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] is not available in [[Canada]].<ref name="skeldon2008">{{REFdocument
|quote=after an infant lost a portion of his penis during an operation with the Mogen clamp, a judge awarded $10.8 million in damages against the company.
  |title=The Medicalization and Resultant Decline of Circumcision in Canada
|date=2010-07-19
  |url=https://prism.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/handle/1880/47498/2008_HMD_Skeldon.pdf?sequence=1
|accessdate=2011-04-08
  |contribution=
}}</ref> after a mohel<ref>{{REFnews
  |last=Skeldon
|last=Tagami
  |first=Sean
|first=Ty
  |publisher=University of Calgary
|url=http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/atlanta-lawyer-wins-11-573890.html
|format=PDF
|title=Atlanta lawyer wins $11 million lawsuit for family in botched circumcision
  |date=2008-03
|publisher=
  |accessdate=2022-06-30
|work=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
|quote=In this case, a New York mohel, or Jewish ritual circumcisor, performed the operation in the baby's home
|date=2010-07-19
|accessdate=2011-04-08
}}</ref> severed the end of a baby's glans<ref>{{REFnews
|last=Tagami
|first=Ty
|url=http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/atlanta-lawyer-wins-11-573890.html
|title=Atlanta lawyer wins $11 million lawsuit for family in botched circumcision
|publisher=
|work=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
|quote=The baby in the current case, identified in court documents only as L.G., lost the entire glans, or head, of his penis ...
|date=2010-07-19
|accessdate=2011-04-08
}}</ref> using one of their clamps. Mogen claimed that injury was impossible with its use.<ref>{{REFnews
|last=Tagami
|first=Ty
|url=http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/atlanta-lawyer-wins-11-573890.html
|title=Atlanta lawyer wins $11 million lawsuit for family in botched circumcision
|publisher=
|work=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
|quote=The maker of an instrument used in circumcisions claimed that injury was impossible with its use...
|date=2010-07-19
|accessdate=2011-04-08
}}</ref> The injury behind a prior lawsuit in Fulton County Superior Court had already put Mogen on notice about the danger of the device.<ref>{{REFnews
  |last=Tagami
|first=Ty
  |url=http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/atlanta-lawyer-wins-11-573890.html
  |title=Atlanta lawyer wins $11 million lawsuit for family in botched circumcision
  |publisher=
  |work=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
  |quote=Attorney David Llewellyn won a similar case in Atlanta last year and the injury behind that prior lawsuit in Fulton County Superior Court put the New York clamp manufacturer on notice about the danger of the device...
  |date=2010-07-19
  |accessdate=2011-04-08
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


In a different case, at South Fulton Medical Center, another law suit was won in 2009.<ref>{{REFnews
{{SEEALSO}}
|last=Tagami
 
|first=Ty
* [[Bias]]
|url=http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/atlanta-lawyer-wins-11-573890.html
* [[Canada]]
|title=Atlanta lawyer wins $11 million lawsuit for family in botched circumcision
* [[Circumcised doctors]]
|publisher=
|work=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
|quote=Llewellyn won another circumcision case in 2009 over an operation at South Fulton Medical Center.
|date=2010-07-19
|accessdate=2011-04-08
}}</ref> In that case, a child lost a third of his glans, and the plaintiffs were awarded 2.3 million dollars.<ref>{{REFnews
|last=Tagami
|first=Ty
|url=http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/atlanta-lawyer-wins-11-573890.html
|title=Atlanta lawyer wins $11 million lawsuit for family in botched circumcision
|publisher=
|work=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
|quote=The jury found that both the pediatrician and the physician who performed the circumcision were negligent, and awarded $2.3 million to the plaintiffs.
|date=2010-07-19
|accessdate=2011-04-08
}}</ref>


{{REF}}
{{REF}}
Line 192: Line 212:
{{DEFAULTSORT:Katz, Murray}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Katz, Murray}}


[[Category:People]]
[[Category:Person]]
[[Category:Male]]
 
[[Category:Interest]]
[[Category:Interest]]
[[Category:Interest]]
[[Category:Physician]]
[[Category:Pollock Group]]
[[Category:Pollock group]]
[[Category:Physicians]]
 
[[Category:Canada]]
 
[[Category:Lawsuit]]


[[Category:From CircLeaks]]
[[Category:From CircLeaks]]
[[Category:From IntactWiki]]
[[Category:From IntactWiki]]
[[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]]