Boldt v. Boldt: Difference between revisions

Legal proceedings: Revise text.
m Remove unnecessary LINKS articles.
Line 106: Line 106:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Thus ended in victory a five-year legal battle to save a boy's [[foreskin]]. The boy's legal, constitutional and human rights prevailed over the father's claimed religious right to excise a functional body part from his son's body.
Thus ended in victory a five-year legal battle to save a boy's [[foreskin]]. The boy's legal, constitutional and human rights prevailed over the father's claimed religious right to excise a functional body part from his son's body. The father's supporters, American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League, and the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America were also on the losing side.


[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]] filed two ''amicus curiae'' briefs in this case and was successful in protecting the boy's [[foreskin]] from [[circumcision]].
[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]] filed two ''amicus curiae'' briefs in this case and was successful in protecting the boy's [[foreskin]] from [[circumcision]].


==Commentary on Boldt v. Boldt==
==Commentary on Boldt v. Boldt==
There has been a fair amount of commentary on this case.


{{LINKS}}
{{LINKS}}


* {{REFweb
 
|url=http://www.circinfo.org/Boldt_case.html
|title=American legal precedent confirms child’s right to reject circumcision
|last=Geisheker
|first=John
|author-link=John V. Geisheker
|accessdate=2020-04-18
}}
* {{REFnews
* {{REFnews
  |title=Ask boy, 12, if he wants to be circumcised, court says
  |title=Ask boy, 12, if he wants to be circumcised, court says
Line 156: Line 151:
  |accessdate=2020-04-19
  |accessdate=2020-04-19
}}
}}
* {{REFjournal
 
|last=Geisheker
|first=John V.
|author-link=John V. Geisheker
|etal=no
|title=Where is the voice of the man the child will become? Defending the child's right to an open future
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=J Clin Ethics
|location=
|date=2010-03
|volume=21
|issue=1
|pages=86-88
|url=http://www.circinfo.org/DOC_Boldt_case.html
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=20465080
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=
|accessdate=2020-04-19
}}


* {{REFjournal
* {{REFjournal
Line 200: Line 174:
  |DOI=
  |DOI=
  |accessdate=2020-04-23
  |accessdate=2020-04-23
}}
* {{REFweb
|url=https://arclaw.org.customers.tigertech.net/wp-content/uploads/Svoboda-Three-Fourths-Were-Abnormal-Mishas-Case-Sick-Societies-and-the-Law-Denniston-Milos-Hodges-Genital-Autonomy-Protecting-Personal-Choice-2010.pdf
|archived=
|title=“Three-Fourths Were Abnormal”—Misha’s Case, Sick Societies, and the Law
|trans-title=
|language=
|last=Svoboda
|first=J. Steven
|author-link=J. Steven Svoboda
|publisher=
|website=arclaw
|date=2010
|accessdate=2020-04-23
|format=
|quote=
}}
}}