Circumcision legal commentary: Difference between revisions
m wikify Dwyer |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add Briefs section. |
||
| Line 543: | Line 543: | ||
|accessdate=2020-05-08 | |accessdate=2020-05-08 | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Briefs== | |||
The two briefs indexed here were filed by [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision]] with the Oregon Supreme Court in the case of [[Boldt v. Boldt]], where they proved instrumental in changing the direction of that case. They have an excellent summary of American Constitutional law relevant to the non-therapeutic circumcision of male children. | |||
* {{REFdocument | |||
|title=BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE, DOCTORS OPPOSING CIRCUMCISION, IN SUPPORT OF THE PETITION FOR REVIEW | |||
|url=https://pool.intactiwiki.org/images/2007-04_BoldtReviewBrief.pdf | |||
|contribution= | |||
|last=Geisheker | |||
|first=John V. | |||
|publisher=Doctors Opposing Circumcision | |||
|format=PDF | |||
|date=2007-04 | |||
|accessdate=2020-05-10 | |||
}} | |||
* {{REFdocument | |||
|title=BRIEF ON THE MERITS OF ''AMICUS CURIAE'', DOCTORS OPPOSING CIRCUMCISION | |||
|url=https://pool.intactiwiki.org/images/2007-07-31_BoldtAmicusBriefMerits.pdf | |||
|contribution= | |||
|last=Geisheker | |||
|first=John | |||
|publisher=Doctors Opposing Circumcision | |||
|format=PDF | |||
|date=2007-07 | |||
|accessdate=2020-05-10 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
{{LINKS}} | {{LINKS}} | ||