Circumcision legal commentary: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Briefs: Add link to Holm Putzke collection. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Commentaries: Add Edge paper. |
||
| Line 458: | Line 458: | ||
|DOI= | |DOI= | ||
|accessdate=2020-05-09 | |accessdate=2020-05-09 | ||
}} | |||
Peter W. Edge (2000) discusses the impact of the Human Rights Act (1998) on the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision of male children in the United Kingdom. | |||
* {{REFjournal | |||
|last=Edge | |||
|first=Peter | |||
|author-link= | |||
|title=Male circumcision after the human rights act 1998 | |||
|journal=J Civil Liberties | |||
|date=2000 | |||
|volume=5 | |||
|issue= | |||
|pages=320 | |||
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/edge1/ | |||
|accessdate=2020-05-10 | |||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 477: | Line 494: | ||
}} | }} | ||
Fox & Thomson (2005) criticise the Britist Medical Associion guidance to doctors. | |||
* {{REFjournal | |||
|last=Fox | |||
|first=Marie | |||
|author-link= | |||
|last2=Thomson | |||
|first2=M | |||
|author2-link= | |||
|etal=no | |||
|title=A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors | |||
|trans-title= | |||
|language= | |||
|journal=J Med Ethics | |||
|location= | |||
|date=2005 | |||
|volume=31 | |||
|issue=8 | |||
|pages=463-9 | |||
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1734197/pdf/v031p00463.pdf | |||
|archived= | |||
|quote= | |||
|pubmedID=16076971 | |||
|pubmedCID=1734197 | |||
|DOI=10.1136/jme.2004.009340 | |||
|accessdate=2020-05-10 | |||
}} | |||
Professor [[Holm Putzke|Putzke]] (2008) points out that there is a criminal relevance of circumcising boys. | Professor [[Holm Putzke|Putzke]] (2008) points out that there is a criminal relevance of circumcising boys. | ||