Richard L. Miller: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add text and citation; add link in SEEALSO section. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add text and citation. |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Circumcision promotion == | == Circumcision promotion == | ||
In 1953, he and [[Donald C. Snyder]] published an influential paper in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, calling for the [[Routine Infant Circumcision|immediate circumcision of all males straight after birth]]. Ignoring [[Douglas Gairdner|Gairdner]] and relying heavily on the writings of [[Abraham L. Wolbarst|Wolbarst]], they insisted that “[[phimosis]]” required immediate surgical correction, and asserted that [[circumcision]] would “reduce the incidence of [[masturbation|onanism]]”, heighten male libido and “increase longevity and immunity to nearly all physical and mental illness.” | In 1953, he and [[Donald C. Snyder]] published an influential paper in the ''American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology'', calling for the [[Routine Infant Circumcision|immediate circumcision of all males straight after birth]]. Ignoring [[Douglas Gairdner|Gairdner]] and relying heavily on the writings of [[Abraham L. Wolbarst|Wolbarst]], they insisted that “[[phimosis]]” required immediate surgical correction, and asserted that [[circumcision]] would “reduce the incidence of [[masturbation|onanism]]”, heighten male libido and “increase longevity and immunity to nearly all physical and mental illness.” | ||
They also stated that [[circumcision]] immediately after birth was convenient for the doctor and in the financial best interests of the hospital. Leading obstetrical textbooks were soon rewritten to include Miller and Snyder’s recommendations. | They also stated that [[circumcision]] immediately after birth was convenient for the doctor and in the financial best interests of the hospital. Leading obstetrical textbooks were soon rewritten to include Miller and Snyder’s recommendations. | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|DOI=10.1097/00007611-197003000-00014 | |DOI=10.1097/00007611-197003000-00014 | ||
|accessdate=2024-05-01 | |accessdate=2024-05-01 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> The American Academy of Pediatrics (1971) declared, "There are no valid medical indications for circumcision in the neonatal period."<ref name="aap1971">{{REFbook | ||
|last=Committee on Fetus and Newborn | |||
|first= | |||
|init= | |||
|year=1971 | |||
|title=Standards and Recommendation for Hospital Care of Newborn infants. 5th ed. | |||
|url=https://www.cirp.org/library/statements/aap/#a1971 | |||
|scope= | |||
|location=Evanston, IL. | |||
|publisher=American Academy of Pediatrics | |||
|ISBN= | |||
|accessdate=2024-05-01 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
{{PUB}} | {{PUB}} | ||