Prevail over the System: Difference between revisions

Line 1:

'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' (POTS) is the name of a Youtube channel dedicated to [[intactivism]]. It claims to offer "Intactivist News & More", however it seems to have little to say about the value of the [[foreskin]], or the [[pain]], [[trauma]], permanent injury and loss of [[Foreskin#Physiological_functions| physiological functions]] of harmful non-therapeutic infant [[circumcision]].

The channel offers numerous linkable videos regarding various aspects of [[intactivism]]. The videos feature an animated cartoon character as the host.

The channel offers numerous linkable videos regarding various aspects of [[intactivism]]. The videos feature an animated cartoon character named "Pots" as the host.

The [[intactivist]] sponsors of POTS are anonymous. The introductory video claims that there are four seasoned [[intactivist]] sponsors with more than twenty years of experience. The statement is ambiguous. It is not clear whether each of the four intactivists have twenty years of experience or whether the four together have a total of twenty years of experience.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' (POTS) is the name of a Youtube channel dedicated to [[intactivism]]. It claims to offer "Intactivist News & More", however it seems to have little to say about the value of the [[foreskin]], or the [[pain]], [[trauma]], permanent injury and loss of [[Foreskin#Physiological_functions| physiological functions]] of harmful non-therapeutic infant [[circumcision]].
-The channel offers numerous linkable videos regarding various aspects of [[intactivism]]. The videos feature an animated cartoon character as the host.
+The channel offers numerous linkable videos regarding various aspects of [[intactivism]]. The videos feature an animated cartoon character named "Pots" as the host.
 The [[intactivist]] sponsors of POTS are anonymous. The introductory video claims that there are four seasoned [[intactivist]] sponsors with more than twenty years of experience. The statement is ambiguous. It is not clear whether each of the four intactivists have twenty years of experience or whether the four together have a total of twenty years of experience.