Arguments pro circumcision: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

Revision as of 14:03, 24 February 2020 view source WikiAdmin (talk \| contribs) administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 22,834 edits mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:13, 24 February 2020 view source WikiAdmin (talk \| contribs) administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 22,834 edits m wikify section "Religious arguments" Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Pro circumcision activists have many arguments why the medically not indicated [[circumcision]] should make sense. This page tries to offer an almost complete list and a ranking of the pro arcuments. All arguments listed hereafter can be and already have been refuted, the religious arguments included.		Pro circumcision activists have many arguments why the medically not indicated [[circumcision]] should make sense. This page tries to offer an almost complete list and a ranking of the pro arcuments. All arguments listed hereafter can be and already have been refuted, the [[#Religious arguments\|religious arguments]] included.

	All arguments listed here and their refutations generally refer to children who are fundamentally owner of all human rights since birth and who are fundamentally unable to consent to irreversible physical modifications.		All arguments listed here and their refutations generally refer to children who are fundamentally owner of all human rights since birth and who are fundamentally unable to consent to irreversible physical modifications.