Boldt v. Boldt: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m →Commentary on Boldt v. Boldt: typo |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Commentary on Boldt v. Boldt: Add citation. |
||
| Line 134: | Line 134: | ||
The 2009 NOCIRC Annual Newsletter commented: | The 2009 NOCIRC Annual Newsletter commented: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
The US Supreme Court in October turned down a father’s petition in Boldt v Boldt. The boy’s father, who converted to Judaism and wants his son circumcised, was unhappy with the decision of the Oregon Supreme Court to determine the wishes of the child, and appealed to the US Supreme Court, alleging the child’s wishes are irrelevant. Fortunately, the right of the boy was paramount in the court’s decision. | The US Supreme Court in October turned down a father’s petition in Boldt v Boldt. The boy’s father, who converted to Judaism and wants his son circumcised, was unhappy with the decision of the Oregon Supreme Court to determine the wishes of the child, and appealed to the US Supreme Court, alleging the child’s wishes are irrelevant. Fortunately, the right of the boy was paramount in the court’s decision.<ref>{{REFweb | ||
|url=http://www.nocirc.org/publish/2009nocirc_newsletter.pdf | |||
|title=2009 NOCIRC Annual Newsletter | |||
|last=Milos | |||
|first=Marilyn | |||
|accessdate=2020-04-25 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||