Circumcision legal commentary: Difference between revisions

Add clarifying phrase.
Commentaries: Add Llewellyn 1995 article.
Line 220: Line 220:
  |url=https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1167&context=facpubs
  |url=https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1167&context=facpubs
  |accessdate=2020-05-08
  |accessdate=2020-05-08
}}
[[David J. Llewellyn]] (1995) discusses legal remedies when hospitals or doctors injure patients by circumcision.
* {{REFjournal
|last=Llewellyn
|first=David
|author-link=David J. Llewellyn
|title=Legal remedies for penile torts
|journal=The Compleat Mother
|date=1995
|volume=40
|issue=Winter
|pages=16
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/USA/llewellyn/
|accessdate=2020-05-13
}}
}}


Line 228: Line 245:
  |first=Neville
  |first=Neville
  |author-link=J. Neville Turner
  |author-link=J. Neville Turner
  |title=Circumciesd boys may sue
  |title=Circumcised boys may sue
  |journal=Health Law Update
  |journal=Health Law Update
  |date=1996-02-23
  |date=1996-02-23