Wikipedia bias on circumcision: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Revise text. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 209: | Line 209: | ||
|accessdate=2021-07-29 | |accessdate=2021-07-29 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
While Wikipedia may profess to write from a neutral point of view (NPOV), the use of so many sources biased in favor of circumcision and the omission of most of the functions of the foreskin drags the neutral point over into a pro-circumcision position. | |||
The Circumcision article has been amended more than 15,000 times<ref name="circhistory2001" /> so it is an unstable source of information. | The Circumcision article has been amended more than 15,000 times<ref name="circhistory2001" /> so it is an unstable source of information. | ||
The general public and parents in particular should be aware of these issues and seek information elsewhere. | |||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||