Wikipedia bias on circumcision: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 210: | Line 210: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
While Wikipedia may profess to write from a neutral point of view (NPOV), the use of so many sources biased in favor of circumcision and | While Wikipedia may profess to write from a neutral point of view (NPOV), the use of adamantly pro-circumcision editors and their selection of so many sources biased in favor of circumcision and their omission of most of the functions of the foreskin drags the neutral point over into a pro-circumcision position. | ||
The Circumcision article has been amended more than 15,000 times<ref name="circhistory2001" /> so it is an unstable source of information. | The Circumcision article has been amended more than 15,000 times<ref name="circhistory2001" /> so it is an unstable source of information. | ||