Difference between revisions of "Routine Infant Circumcision"
m (add SEEALSO) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Revise text; add citation.) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| − | Routine infant circumcision no longer exists in the United States, except when a hospital or doctor makes an error for which they can be sued. The phrase is outmoded and inaccurate so it should not be used to refer to non-therapeutic circumcision of boys. | + | Routine infant circumcision no longer exists in the United States, except when a hospital or doctor makes an error for which they can be sued. The phrase is outmoded and inaccurate so it should not be used to refer to non-therapeutic circumcision of boys. The [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] declared non-therapeutic infant circumcision to be an ''elective'' surgery decades ago (1989).<ref name="aap1989">{{REFjournal |
| + | |last=Schoen | ||
| + | |first=Edgar J. | ||
| + | |init=EJ | ||
| + | |author-link=Edgar J. Schoen | ||
| + | |last2=Anderson | ||
| + | |first2=Glenn | ||
| + | |init2=G | ||
| + | |author2-link= | ||
| + | |last3=Bohon | ||
| + | |first3=Constance | ||
| + | |init3=C | ||
| + | |author3-link= | ||
| + | |last4=Hinman | ||
| + | |first4=Frank | ||
| + | |init4=F | ||
| + | |author4-link= | ||
| + | |last5=Poland | ||
| + | |first5=Ronald | ||
| + | |init5=R | ||
| + | |author5-link= | ||
| + | |last6=Wakeman | ||
| + | |first6=E. Maurice | ||
| + | |init6=EM | ||
| + | |author6-link= | ||
| + | |etal=no | ||
| + | |title=Report of the Task Force of Circumcision. | ||
| + | |journal=Pediatrics | ||
| + | |location= | ||
| + | |date=1989-11 | ||
| + | |volume=84 | ||
| + | |issue=4 | ||
| + | |pages=388-91 | ||
| + | |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/statements/aap/#a1989 | ||
| + | |archived= | ||
| + | |quote= | ||
| + | |pubmedID=2664697 | ||
| + | |pubmedCID= | ||
| + | |DOI= | ||
| + | |accessdate=2021-08-03 | ||
| + | }}</ref> Use of the phrase "routine infant circumcision" or "RIC" is a sign of ignorance on the part of the user. | ||
{{SEEALSO}} | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
| Line 28: | Line 68: | ||
* {{REFjournal | * {{REFjournal | ||
|last=Svobody | |last=Svobody | ||
| − | | | + | |first=J. Steven |
|init=JS | |init=JS | ||
|last2=Van Howe | |last2=Van Howe | ||
Revision as of 16:07, 3 August 2021
RIC is an acronym for Routine Infant Circumcision.
Mainly in the United States, boys were circumcised in many hospitals immediately after birth. Very often, this was done without informing or asking the parents previously at all.
The word routine, when applied to non-therapeutic circumcision of boys is outmoded. Circumcision has not been 'routine' since court rulings started to require informed consent in 1972.[1]
Routine infant circumcision (i. e. non-therapeutic circumcision without consent) is an unlawful procedure for which damages may be recovered.[2]
Routine infant circumcision no longer exists in the United States, except when a hospital or doctor makes an error for which they can be sued. The phrase is outmoded and inaccurate so it should not be used to refer to non-therapeutic circumcision of boys. The American Academy of Pediatrics declared non-therapeutic infant circumcision to be an elective surgery decades ago (1989).[3] Use of the phrase "routine infant circumcision" or "RIC" is a sign of ignorance on the part of the user.
See also
External links
Svobody JS, Van Howe RS, Dwyer JG. Informed Consent for Neonatal Circumcision: An Ethical and Legal Conundrum. J Contemporary Health Law Policy. 2000; 167(61) Retrieved 29 December 2020.
References
- ↑ Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772, 782 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1064 (1972)
- ↑ Llewellyn DJ. Legal remedies for penile torts. The Compleat Mother. 1995; 40: 16. Retrieved 4 January 2020.
- ↑ Schoen EJ, Anderson G, Bohon C, Hinman F, Poland R, Wakeman EM. Report of the Task Force of Circumcision.. Pediatrics. November 1989; 84(4): 388-91. PMID. Retrieved 3 August 2021.