Difference between revisions of "Dr. Bidair"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
 
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
  
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' has a website but the [[sexual effects of circumcision]] are not well-communicated. The surgeon most provide all material information to the patient before [[informed consent]] can be granted. There is a strong tendency for the surgeon to omit telling the patient anything about the nature and [http://www.intactaus.org/information/functionsoftheforeskin/ functions of the foreskin]. Masood has emphasized the importance of telling men correctly<ref name="masood2005">{{REFjournal
+
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' has a website but the [[sexual effects of circumcision]] are not well-communicated. The surgeon most provide all material information to the patient before [[informed consent]] can be granted. There is a strong tendency for the surgeon to omit telling the patient anything about the nature and [http://www.intactaus.org/information/functionsoftheforeskin/ functions of the foreskin]. Masood has emphasized the importance of telling men correctly.<ref name="masood2005">{{REFjournal
 
  |last=Masood
 
  |last=Masood
 
  |init=S
 
  |init=S
Line 27: Line 27:
 
  |DOI=10.1159/000085930
 
  |DOI=10.1159/000085930
 
  |accessdate=2023-04-08
 
  |accessdate=2023-04-08
}}</ref>, however the information provided by Dr. Bidair does not satisfy the requirements of the legal requirements of [[informed consent]].
+
}}</ref> however the information provided by Dr. Bidair does not satisfy the legal requirements of [[informed consent]].
 +
 
 +
It is not known how many of his patients are [[regret men]].
 
{{REF}}
 
{{REF}}
  

Revision as of 02:11, 29 September 2024

Construction Site

This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.

 

Dr. Bidair is a California-based promoter of usually unnecessary adult circumcision.[1]

Dr. Bidair has a website but the sexual effects of circumcision are not well-communicated. The surgeon most provide all material information to the patient before informed consent can be granted. There is a strong tendency for the surgeon to omit telling the patient anything about the nature and functions of the foreskin. Masood has emphasized the importance of telling men correctly.[2] however the information provided by Dr. Bidair does not satisfy the legal requirements of informed consent.

It is not known how many of his patients are regret men.

References

  1. REFweb Alissa, Kristel (26 September 2024). Debunking A Pro-Circumcision Doctor’s Arguments: The Real Truth Behind the Myths, Intact America. Retrieved 28 September 2024.
  2. REFjournal Masood S, et al. Penile sensitivity and sexual satisfaction after circumcision: are we informing men correctly?. Urol Int. 2005; 75(1): 62-6. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 8 April 2023.