Arguments pro circumcision: Difference between revisions
m wikify Masturbation |
mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* '''Today, the foreskin has no function any more.''' | * '''Today, the foreskin has no function any more.''' | ||
*: This argument holds very persistently, often used by women who only know | *: This argument holds very persistently, often used by women who only know circumcised men, but even by urologists who earn a lot of money with [[circumcision]]s and therefore welcome any argument pro [[circumcision]]. | ||
*: A common stereotype of this argument sounds like this: "The [[foreskin]] was necessary when we lived in trees and crawled on all fours. The [[foreskin]] then had protected the [[Glans penis|glans]]. Now that we are running on two legs and men no longer grind their genital over the floor, the [[foreskin]] can therefore get away." | *: A common stereotype of this argument sounds like this: "The [[foreskin]] was necessary when we lived in trees and crawled on all fours. The [[foreskin]] then had protected the [[Glans penis|glans]]. Now that we are running on two legs and men no longer grind their genital over the floor, the [[foreskin]] can therefore get away." | ||
*: During the [[Circumcision Debate]] 2012 in Germany, a single Muslim children's surgeon from Cologne was repeatedly quoted<ref>{{REFweb | *: During the [[Circumcision Debate]] 2012 in Germany, a single Muslim children's surgeon from Cologne was repeatedly quoted<ref>{{REFweb | ||