Ethics of non-therapeutic child circumcision: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:
  |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080720092409/http://www.racp.edu.au/download.cfm?DownloadFile=A453CFA1-2A57-5487-DF36DF59A1BAF527
  |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080720092409/http://www.racp.edu.au/download.cfm?DownloadFile=A453CFA1-2A57-5487-DF36DF59A1BAF527
  |archivedate=2008-07-20
  |archivedate=2008-07-20
}}</ref> <ref name="bma2006">Committee on Medical Ethics. [http://www.bma.org.uk/-/media/Files/PDFs/Practical advice at work/Ethics/Circumcision.pdf The law and ethics of male circumcision: Guidance for doctors]. London: British Medical Association 2006.</ref>
}}</ref> <ref name="bma2006">Committee on Medical Ethics. [https://www.bma.org.uk/advice/employment/ethics/children-and-young-people/non-therapeutic-male-circumcision-of-children-ethics-toolkit The law and ethics of male circumcision: Guidance for doctors]. London: British Medical Association 2006.</ref>


Some medical associations take the position that the parents should determine what is in the best interest of the infant or child.<ref name="AAP1999">{{REFjournal
Some medical associations take the position that the parents should determine what is in the best interest of the infant or child.<ref name="AAP1999">{{REFjournal