Difference between revisions of "Illinois - Judge says no to circumcision"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m (wikify)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{Construction Site}}
+
'''Illinois: Judge Says No to Circumcision for Boy''' is the headline used by the ''New York Times'' on 25 October 2006 for a report on the historic, precedent-setting Schmidt v. Niznik case in Chicago, Illinois in which the court prohibited the [[circumcision]] of a boy until he is old enough to decide for himself.
 +
 
 +
The case represented a victory for the [[genital autonomy]] movement.
 +
 
 +
The case generated substantial media comment.
 +
 
 +
{{SEEALSO}}
 +
* [[Schmidt v. Niznik]]
  
 
{{LINKS}}
 
{{LINKS}}
−
* http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/25/us/25brfs-003.html?_r=1&
+
* {{REFnews
−
* http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/2006-02-19-circumcision_x.htm
+
|title=Circumcision dispute lands in Illinois court
−
* http://www.illinoisdivorcelawyerblog.com/2006/10/an_example_of_joint_custody_me.html
+
|url=http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/2006-02-19-circumcision_x.htm
−
* http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2006-10-25/news/0610250034_1_circumcision-boy-custodial
+
|last=
 +
|first=
 +
|coauthors=
 +
|publisher=USA Today
 +
|website=http://usatoday30.usatoday.com
 +
|date=2006-02-19
 +
|accessdate=2020-06-06
 +
|quote=A clash over of their son's circumcision has landed the parents of an eight-year-old Illinois boy in a U.S. court where there is no apparent precedent.
 +
}}
 +
* {{REFnews
 +
|title=Court bans forcing boy's circumcision
 +
|url=http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2006-10-25/news/0610250034_1_circumcision-boy-custodial
 +
|last=Peres
 +
|first=Judy
 +
|coauthors=
 +
|publisher=Chicago Tribune
 +
|website=www.chicagotribune.com
 +
|date=2006-10-25
 +
|accessdate=2020-06-06
 +
|quote=Because there are no U.S. precedents, other courts could look to this ruling in future cases, said [[George Hill]] of [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]].
 +
}}
 +
* {{REFnews
 +
|title=Illinois: Judge Says No to Circumcision for Boy
 +
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/25/us/25brfs-003.html?_r=1&
 +
|last=
 +
|first=
 +
|coauthors=
 +
|publisher=New York Times
 +
|website=www.nytimes.com/
 +
|date=2006-10-25
 +
|accessdate=2020-06-06
 +
|quote=The judge, Jordan Kaplan of Circuit Court in Cook County, said that the procedure was “an extraordinary medical procedure” for a 9-year-old and that the boy could decide for himself when he turned 18.
 +
}}
  
 +
* {{REFnews
 +
|title=An Example of Joint Custody Medical Decisions
 +
|url=http://www.illinoisdivorcelawyerblog.com/2006/10/an_example_of_joint_custody_me.html
 +
|last=Roe
 +
|first=Michael
 +
|coauthors=
 +
|publisher=Illinois Divorce Law Blog
 +
|website=
 +
|date=2006-10-26
 +
|accessdate=2020-06-06
 +
|quote=
 +
}}
 
<!-- {{REF}} -->
 
<!-- {{REF}} -->
  
 
[[Category:Litigation]]
 
[[Category:Litigation]]
 
[[Category:Litigation over circumcision]]
 
[[Category:Litigation over circumcision]]
−
 
+
[[Category:'... v. ...']]
 
[[Category:From IntactWiki]]
 
[[Category:From IntactWiki]]

Latest revision as of 10:45, 16 June 2022

Illinois: Judge Says No to Circumcision for Boy is the headline used by the New York Times on 25 October 2006 for a report on the historic, precedent-setting Schmidt v. Niznik case in Chicago, Illinois in which the court prohibited the circumcision of a boy until he is old enough to decide for himself.

The case represented a victory for the genital autonomy movement.

The case generated substantial media comment.

See also

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Illinois_-_Judge_says_no_to_circumcision&oldid=27448"