17,052
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Late nineteenth century: Revise text.
}}</ref>
When Remondino described discussed the [[foreskin]], he used the most horrific, derogatory,and disparaging language. He devoted several thirteen chapters to the alleged evils and faults of the foreskin. It is not clear why he had such an extreme dislike for a natural and functional body part. His recommendation, of course, was for [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]].
By the end of the nineteenth century, America had at least one prominent physician and surgeon on the east coast promoting circumcision and another prominent physician and surgeon on the west coast promoting circumcision. There was no real medical science with which to dispute and discredit their false claims. Non-therapeutic circumcision of males was now well-established in the United States.