Difference between revisions of "Adamant father syndrome"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add Denniston story.)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
  |url=
 
  |url=
 
  |work=
 
  |work=
  |editor=
+
  |editor=George C. Denniston,Frederick Mansfield Hodges,Marilyn Fayre Milos
 
  |edition=
 
  |edition=
 
  |volume=
 
  |volume=
Line 21: Line 21:
 
  |accessdate=2019-11-11
 
  |accessdate=2019-11-11
 
  |note=
 
  |note=
}}</ref><ref name="hill2012">{{REFweb
+
}}</ref> <ref name="hill2012">{{REFweb
 
  |url=http://www.drmomma.org/2009/07/circumcision-human-behavior.html
 
  |url=http://www.drmomma.org/2009/07/circumcision-human-behavior.html
 
  |title=Circumcision & Human Behavior  
 
  |title=Circumcision & Human Behavior  
Line 98: Line 98:
 
}}</ref></blockquote>
 
}}</ref></blockquote>
  
Denniston tells the story of the intern who was in the hospital nursery circumcising newborn boys in the middle of the nightː
+
To illustrate the compulsion to repeat the trauma, Denniston (2000) tells the story of the intern who was in the hospital nursery circumcising newborn boys in the middle of the nightː
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
For  instance, a medical  colleague informed me that, a few years ago, the night nurse on duty in an American hospital telephoned a senior resident in the middle of the night. She said to him  in alarm, “You  had better come  down to  the nursery right now. One of the  interns is  circumcising  babies.” When he arrived on the floor, he found the  intern circumcising a newborn infant. The resident said, “Don’t  you think that, before you perform circumcisions, you  had better get some training? Aren’t you concerned that you  might  be removing too much skin?” The intern looked at him, and replied, “No more than they took off me!”*  Sadly this young  man  had failed to recover from his own trauma. Like many  victims, he did not realise that, since the  trauma of circumcision should not have been inflicted on him, he certainly  should not be inflicting circumcision on other human beingref></ref>
+
For  instance, a medical  colleague informed me that, a few years ago, the night nurse on duty in an American hospital telephoned a senior resident in the middle of the night. She said to him  in alarm, “You  had better come  down to  the nursery right now. One of the  interns is  circumcising  babies.” When he arrived on the floor, he found the  intern circumcising a newborn infant. The resident said, “Don’t  you think that, before you perform circumcisions, you  had better get some training? Aren’t you concerned that you  might  be removing too much skin?” The intern looked at him, and replied, “No more than they took off me!”*  Sadly this young  man  had failed to recover from his own trauma. Like many  victims, he did not realise that, since the  trauma of circumcision should not have been inflicted on him, he certainly  should not be inflicting circumcision on other human beinɡ.<ref>{{REFbook
 +
|last=Denniston
 +
|first=George C.
 +
|author-link=George C. Denniston
 +
|last2=
 +
|first2=
 +
|author2-link=
 +
|year=2000
 +
|title=Male and Female Circumcisionː Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice
 +
|url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-585-39937-9_17
 +
|work=
 +
|editor=
 +
|edition=
 +
|volume=
 +
|chapter=Tyranny of the Victims: An Analysis of Circumcision Advocacy
 +
|pages=221-40
 +
|location=
 +
|publisher=Springer
 +
|isbn=
 +
|quote=
 +
|accessdate=2020-07-29
 +
|note=
 +
}}</ref>
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  

Revision as of 18:02, 29 July 2020

Adamant father syndrome is the term used to describe the behavior manifested by many circumcised men when they become fathers. The "adamant father" typically insists that any son born be circumcised even though there is no medical reason for it and it is contrary to current medical advice.[1] [2]

According to Brown & Brown (1987)[3] and Rediger & Muller (2013),[4] the circumcision status of the father is the most important determining factor in whether a boy is circumcised after birth.

Goldman (1999) reports that circumcision is trauma and that trauma tends to repeat itself:

The behavioural re-enactment of the trauma is a compulsion for some trauma victims. Circumcision of infants may be regarded as an example of re-enacting the trauma of one's own circumcision. A survey of randomly selected primary care physicians showed that circumcision was more often supported by doctors who were older, male and circumcised.[5]

To illustrate the compulsion to repeat the trauma, Denniston (2000) tells the story of the intern who was in the hospital nursery circumcising newborn boys in the middle of the nightː

For instance, a medical colleague informed me that, a few years ago, the night nurse on duty in an American hospital telephoned a senior resident in the middle of the night. She said to him in alarm, “You had better come down to the nursery right now. One of the interns is circumcising babies.” When he arrived on the floor, he found the intern circumcising a newborn infant. The resident said, “Don’t you think that, before you perform circumcisions, you had better get some training? Aren’t you concerned that you might be removing too much skin?” The intern looked at him, and replied, “No more than they took off me!”* Sadly this young man had failed to recover from his own trauma. Like many victims, he did not realise that, since the trauma of circumcision should not have been inflicted on him, he certainly should not be inflicting circumcision on other human beinɡ.[6]

Hill (2012) commented:

The best way to stop the cycle of trauma is to stop circumcising infants. Non-traumatized intact infants usually do not grow up to become circumcisers, so the cycle of trauma would end.[2]

See also

External links

References

  1. REFbook Bigelow, Jim (1992): Chapter 10, Psychological Factors Related to Infant Circumcision, in: The Joy of Uncircumcising!. George C. Denniston,Frederick Mansfield Hodges,Marilyn Fayre Milos (ed.). Hourglass Book Publishing, Inc. Pp. 89-112. ISBN 0-934061-22-X. Retrieved 11 November 2019.
  2. a b REFweb Hill, George (2012). Circumcision & Human Behavior. Retrieved 11 November 2019.
  3. REFjournal Brown, Mark S., Brown, Cheryl A.. Circumcision Decision: Prominence of Social Concerns. Pediatrics. August 1987; 80(2): 215-219. PMID. Retrieved 10 November 2019.
  4. REFjournal Rediger, Chris, Muller, Andries J.. Parents' rationale for male circumcision. Can Fam Physician. February 2013; 59(2): e110-e115. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 10 November 2019.
  5. REFjournal Goldman, Ronald. The psychological impact of circumcision. BJU Int. 1999; 83 Suppl 1: 93-103. PMID. Retrieved 11 November 2019.
  6. REFbook Denniston, George C. (2000): Tyranny of the Victims: An Analysis of Circumcision Advocacy, in: Male and Female Circumcisionː Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice. Springer. Pp. 221-40. Retrieved 29 July 2020.