Difference between revisions of "Foreskin Restoration: Uncircumcision"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add SEEALSO section.)
m (fixed formatting)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
{{Citation
 
{{Citation
| Title=
+
|Title=
| Text=Those circumcised men who feel they were seriously cheated in being deprived of their foreskins may be interested in an  article in the latest (November 21) issue of ''The Advocate'' on foreskin  restoration.  
+
|Text=Those circumcised men who feel they were seriously cheated in being deprived of their foreskins may be interested in an  article in the latest (November 21) issue of ''The Advocate'' on foreskin  restoration.  
  
 
Basically, the article describes a plausible-sounding technique for  restoring the functionality of a foreskin by stretching the skin of the  {*filter*}.  It is promoted by a doctor named Mark Waring who documented  the techniques in a 64-page booklet called Foreskin Restoration (Uncircumcision), available from (hope it's okay to post this):  
 
Basically, the article describes a plausible-sounding technique for  restoring the functionality of a foreskin by stretching the skin of the  {*filter*}.  It is promoted by a doctor named Mark Waring who documented  the techniques in a 64-page booklet called Foreskin Restoration (Uncircumcision), available from (hope it's okay to post this):  
Line 25: Line 25:
  
 
Disclaimer:  I know nothing more about this technique than I read in  the article.  Furthermore, I'm female and unlikely to be partaking in  any of this myself :-).  But it seems very pertinent to the recurring  discussions.  Get the article or the book for yourself (and monitor these newsgroups)  for further information and debate! - Susan (1993)
 
Disclaimer:  I know nothing more about this technique than I read in  the article.  Furthermore, I'm female and unlikely to be partaking in  any of this myself :-).  But it seems very pertinent to the recurring  discussions.  Get the article or the book for yourself (and monitor these newsgroups)  for further information and debate! - Susan (1993)
| Author=
+
|Author=Susan Co
| Source=Message on a BB
+
|Source=Message on a BB
| ref=<ref>{{REFweb
+
|ref=<ref>{{REFweb
 
  |url=http://www.science-bbs.com/126-med/711a94954195389f.htm
 
  |url=http://www.science-bbs.com/126-med/711a94954195389f.htm
 
  |title=Uncircumcision
 
  |title=Uncircumcision
|trans-title=
 
|language=
 
 
  |last=Co
 
  |last=Co
 
  |first=Susan
 
  |first=Susan
|author-link=
 
 
  |publisher=Science Forums
 
  |publisher=Science Forums
 
  |website=science-bbs
 
  |website=science-bbs
 
  |date=1993-04-19
 
  |date=1993-04-19
 
  |accessdate=2020-01-28
 
  |accessdate=2020-01-28
|format=
 
|quote=
 
 
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
 +
}}
  
 
{{SEEALSO}}
 
{{SEEALSO}}
Line 58: Line 54:
 
* https://www.eskimo.com/~gburlin/restore/jae/books.html
 
* https://www.eskimo.com/~gburlin/restore/jae/books.html
 
-->
 
-->
 
  
 
{{REF}}
 
{{REF}}

Revision as of 18:18, 10 November 2021

Book Data
Title Foreskin Restoration
SubtitleUncircumcision
AuthorWaring, Mark
Pages 64
EditionOut of print
First Edition1988
PublisherNew Orleans: Second Skin Books


Those circumcised men who feel they were seriously cheated in being deprived of their foreskins may be interested in an article in the latest (November 21) issue of The Advocate on foreskin restoration.

Basically, the article describes a plausible-sounding technique for restoring the functionality of a foreskin by stretching the skin of the {*filter*}. It is promoted by a doctor named Mark Waring who documented the techniques in a 64-page booklet called Foreskin Restoration (Uncircumcision), available from (hope it's okay to post this):

Second Skin Books
521 Rue St. Philip
New Orleans, LA 70116

for $14.95 plus $1.25 postage and handling. Supposedly a new, bigger, illustrated publication on the same subject is due out next year. Dr. Waring said he got the idea after seeing a program on an African tribe whose members stretch their lips and earlobes. The technique supposedly takes about *three years* of continual effort to achieve complete coverage of the glans, but if you feel seriously handicapped by the lack of a foreskin, well, it might be worth putting your money where ... uh ...

Disclaimer: I know nothing more about this technique than I read in the article. Furthermore, I'm female and unlikely to be partaking in any of this myself :-). But it seems very pertinent to the recurring discussions. Get the article or the book for yourself (and monitor these newsgroups) for further information and debate! - Susan (1993)
– Susan Co (Message on a BB)[1]

See also


References

  1. REFweb Co, Susan (19 April 1993). Uncircumcision, science-bbs, Science Forums. Retrieved 28 January 2020.