Difference between revisions of "Bono"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m (Typo.) |
(using Template:Population-based studies) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
{{NOTE}} Bono holds no medical credentials of any kind. He is neither a doctor, surgeon, urologist, nor epidemiologist. | {{NOTE}} Bono holds no medical credentials of any kind. He is neither a doctor, surgeon, urologist, nor epidemiologist. | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | == Population-based studies == | |
| − | + | {{Population-based studies}} | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:21, 21 August 2022
Bono of the band U2 promotes circumcision as HIV prevention.[1]
| “ | Antiretroviral treatment + male circumcision = 60% reduction Yet today, here we are, talking seriously about the ‘end’ of this global epidemic. There are now 6.6 million people on life-saving AIDS medicine. But still too many are being infected. New research proves that early antiretroviral treatment, especially for pregnant women, in combination with male circumcision, will slash the rate of new H.I.V. cases by up to 60 percent. This is the tipping point we have been campaigning for. We’re nearly there. – Bono (‘A decade of progress on AIDS’)[1] |
Note: Bono holds no medical credentials of any kind. He is neither a doctor, surgeon, urologist, nor epidemiologist.
Population-based studies
September 2021 saw the publication of two huge population studies on the relationship of circumcision and HIV infection:
- Mayan et al. (2021) carried out a massive empirical study of the male population of the province of Ontario, Canada (569,950 males), of whom 203,588 (35.7%) were circumcised between 1991 and 2017. The study concluded that circumcision status is not related to risk of HIV infection.[2]
- Morten Frisch & Jacob Simonsen (2021) carried out a large scale empirical population study in Denmark of 855,654 males regarding the alleged value of male circumcision in preventing HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in men. They found that circumcised men have a higher rate of STI and HIV infection overall than intact men.[3]
No association between lack of circumcision and risk of HIV infection was found by either study. There now is credible evidence that the massive, expensive African circumcision programs have not been effective in preventing HIV infection.
References
- ↑ a b
Carter, Jenna (1 December 2011)."Bono: ‘A decade of progress on AIDS’", One.org. Retrieved 30 December 2012.
Quote:New research proves that early antiretroviral treatment, especially for pregnant women, in combination with male circumcision, will slash the rate of new H.I.V. cases by up to 60 percent.
- ↑
Mayan M, Hamilton RJ, Juurlink DN, Austin PC, Jarvi KA. Circumcision and Risk of HIV Among Males From Ontario, Canada. J Urol. 23 September 2021; PMID. DOI. Retrieved 21 August 2022.
Quote:We found that circumcision was not independently associated with the risk of acquiring HIV among men from Ontario, Canada.
- ↑ Frisch M, Simonsen J. Non-therapeutic male circumcision in infancy or childhood and risk of human immunodeficiency virus and other sexually transmitted infections: national cohort study in Denmark. Eur J Epidemiol. 26 September 2021; 37: 251–9. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 16 January 2022.
