Difference between revisions of "Catheterization of intact boys"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
These issues do not occur in other advanced nations where health care providers are properly trained in the care of [[intact]] boys. | These issues do not occur in other advanced nations where health care providers are properly trained in the care of [[intact]] boys. | ||
| − | Carmack & Milos (2017) identified the | + | Carmack & Milos (2017) identified the issues with intact boys and provided all necessary information on the technique of installing a catheter in an intact boy.<ref name="carmack2017">{{REFjournal |
|last=Carmack | |last=Carmack | ||
|first=Adrienne | |first=Adrienne | ||
Revision as of 19:13, 16 February 2023
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
Catheterization of intact boys with a non-retractile foreskin in the United States and Canada frequently presents unique issues caused by the poor training and lack of knowledge of North American health care providers, who do not know how to insert a catheter when the boy has an intact foreskin. Such providers may attempt premature forced foreskin retraction to the harm of the boy or even demand that the boy be circumcised to permit catheter insertion.
These issues do not occur in other advanced nations where health care providers are properly trained in the care of intact boys.
Carmack & Milos (2017) identified the issues with intact boys and provided all necessary information on the technique of installing a catheter in an intact boy.[1] A PDF version is available and may be printed and provided to a health care provider.
References
- ↑
Carmack, Adrienne, Milos, Marilyn F.. Catheterization without foreskin retraction. Can Fam Physician. March 2017; 63(3): 218-20. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 16 February 2023.
