Changes

Philo used philosophical allegory to attempt to fuse and harmonize Greek philosophy with Jewish philosophy. His method followed the practices of both Jewish exegesis and Stoic philosophy. His allegorical exegesis was important for several Christian Church Fathers, but he has barely any reception history within [[Judaism]]. He believed that literal interpretations of the Hebrew Bible would stifle mankind's view and perception of a God too complex and marvelous to be understood in literal human terms.

Philo of Alexandria advanced four reasons for [[circumcision]]: protection against the "severe and incurable malady of the [[Foreskin| prepuce ]] called anthrax or carbuncle"; the promotion of the cleanliness of the whole body as befits the consecrated order; the analogy of the [[circumcised ]] member to the heart (following Jeremiah); and the promotion of fertility.<ref name="james1976" /> Philo also claimed that circumcision "spiritualizes" the Jewish male by decreasing pride and pleasure, hence enhancing the spiritual persona of the Israelite male (De Circumcisione, 11:210).<ref>{{REFweb

He also thought that circumcision should be done as early as possible as it would not be as likely to be done by someone's own free will.<ref name="james1976" /> He claimed that the [[foreskin]] prevented [[semen ]] from reaching the [[vagina ]] and so should be done as a way to increase the nation's population.<ref>{{REFweb

|ref=<ref>{{REFweb |url=httphttps://ecmarshwww.loebclassics.com/crlview/philo_judaeus-special_laws/philo1937/book27.htm#:~:text=Book%2027%3A%20Philo%2C%20The%20Special%20Laws%2C%20Ipb_LCL320.%20Yonge%27s,is%20turned%20into%20ridicule%20by%20people%20in%20general99. xml |title=A Treatise On Circumcision. Philo Judaeus |accessdate=20212022-0611-2005}}</ref>

The Christian fathers rejected the practice of circumcision for Christians at the [[Council at Jerusalem]] in 49 A.D. shortly before Philo's death.<ref>Acts of the Apostles 15:1-30.</ref>