Difference between revisions of "Catheterization of intact boys"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add text; Add SEEALSO section.)
(Add link in SEEALSO section.)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' with a non-retractile [[foreskin]] in the [[United States]] and [[Canada]] frequently presents unique issues caused by the poor training and lack of knowledge of North American healthcare providers, who do not know how to insert a catheter when the boy has a normal [[intact]] foreskin.<ref name="carmack2017">{{REFjournal
+
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' with a non-retractile [[foreskin]] in the [[United States]] and [[Canada]] frequently presents unique issues caused by the poor training and lack of knowledge of North American healthcare providers, who do not know how to insert a catheter when the boy has a normal [[intact]] [[foreskin]].<ref name="carmack2017">{{REFjournal
 
  |last=Carmack
 
  |last=Carmack
 
  |first=Adrienne
 
  |first=Adrienne
Line 25: Line 25:
 
  |DOI=
 
  |DOI=
 
  |accessdate=2023-02-16
 
  |accessdate=2023-02-16
}}</ref> The foreskin is normally non-retractable in childhood. Such providers may attempt premature [[forced foreskin retraction]] to the harm of the boy or even demand that the boy be [[circumcised]] to permit catheter insertion.
+
}}</ref> The foreskin is normally non-retractable in childhood.<ref name="Wright1994">{{REFjournal
 +
|last=Wright
 +
|init=JE
 +
|title=Further to the "Further Fate of the Foreskin"
 +
|journal=Med J Aust
 +
|volume=160
 +
|issue=
 +
|pages=134-135
 +
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/normal/wright2/
 +
|quote=
 +
|pubmedID=8295581
 +
|pubmedCID=
 +
|DOI=
 +
|date=1994-02-07
 +
|accessdate=2019-10-17
 +
}}</ref> Such providers may attempt premature [[forced foreskin retraction]] to the harm of the boy<ref name="deibart1933">{{REFjournal
 +
|last=Deibart
 +
|init=GA
 +
|title=The separation of the prepuce in the human penis
 +
|journal=Anat Rec
 +
|date=1933
 +
|volume=57
 +
|issue=
 +
|pages=387-99
 +
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/deibert/
 +
|quote=
 +
|pubmedID=
 +
|pubmedCID=
 +
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1090570409
 +
|accessdate=2019-10-07
 +
}}</ref> or even demand that the boy be [[circumcised]] to permit catheter insertion.
  
These issues do not occur in other advanced nations where health care providers are properly trained in the care of [[intact]] boys.
+
These issues do not occur in other advanced nations where healthcare providers are properly trained in the care of [[intact]] boys.
  
Carmack & Milos (2017) identified the issues with [[intact]] boys and provided all necessary information on the technique of inserting a catheter in an intact boy.<ref name="carmack2017" /> A [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349724/pdf/0630218.pdf PDF version] is available and may be printed and provided to a health care provider.
+
Carmack & Milos (2017) identified the issues with [[intact]] boys and provided all necessary information on the technique of inserting a catheter into the [[penis]] of an [[intact]] boy.<ref name="carmack2017" /> A [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349724/pdf/0630218.pdf PDF version] is available and may be printed and provided to a health care provider.
 
{{SEEALSO}}
 
{{SEEALSO}}
 +
* [[Canada]]
 
* [[Development of retractable foreskin]]
 
* [[Development of retractable foreskin]]
 +
* [[United States of America]]
 
{{LINKS}}
 
{{LINKS}}
 
*  {{REFweb
 
*  {{REFweb

Latest revision as of 06:27, 24 April 2024

Catheterization of intact boys with a non-retractile foreskin in the United States and Canada frequently presents unique issues caused by the poor training and lack of knowledge of North American healthcare providers, who do not know how to insert a catheter when the boy has a normal intact foreskin.[1] The foreskin is normally non-retractable in childhood.[2] Such providers may attempt premature forced foreskin retraction to the harm of the boy[3] or even demand that the boy be circumcised to permit catheter insertion.

These issues do not occur in other advanced nations where healthcare providers are properly trained in the care of intact boys.

Carmack & Milos (2017) identified the issues with intact boys and provided all necessary information on the technique of inserting a catheter into the penis of an intact boy.[1] A PDF version is available and may be printed and provided to a health care provider.

See also

External links

References

  1. a b REFjournal Carmack, Adrienne, Milos, Marilyn F.. Catheterization without foreskin retraction. Can Fam Physician. March 2017; 63(3): 218-20. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 16 February 2023.
  2. REFjournal Wright JE. Further to the "Further Fate of the Foreskin". Med J Aust. 7 February 1994; 160: 134-135. PMID. Retrieved 17 October 2019.
  3. REFjournal Deibart GA. The separation of the prepuce in the human penis. Anat Rec. 1933; 57: 387-99. DOI. Retrieved 7 October 2019.