Difference between revisions of "Dr. Bidair"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m (Add text.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add SEEALSO section; delete Construction Site template.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a California-based promoter of usually unnecessary [[adult circumcision]] surgery.<ref>{{REFweb | '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a California-based promoter of usually unnecessary [[adult circumcision]] surgery.<ref>{{REFweb | ||
|url=https://intactamerica.org/debunking-circumcision-myths/ | |url=https://intactamerica.org/debunking-circumcision-myths/ | ||
| Line 30: | Line 29: | ||
It is not known how many of his patients are [[regret men]]. | It is not known how many of his patients are [[regret men]]. | ||
| + | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
| + | * [[Bias]] | ||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
Revision as of 02:38, 29 September 2024
Dr. Bidair is a California-based promoter of usually unnecessary adult circumcision surgery.[1]
Dr. Bidair has a website but the sexual effects of circumcision are not well-communicated. The surgeon most provide all material information to the patient before informed consent can be granted. There is a strong tendency for the surgeon to omit telling the patient anything about the nature and functions of the foreskin. Masood has emphasized the importance of telling men correctly.[2] however the information provided by Dr. Bidair does not satisfy the legal requirements of informed consent.
It is not known how many of his patients are regret men.
See also
References
- ↑
Alissa, Kristel (26 September 2024). Debunking A Pro-Circumcision Doctor’s Arguments: The Real Truth Behind the Myths
, Intact America. Retrieved 28 September 2024. - ↑
Masood S, et al. Penile sensitivity and sexual satisfaction after circumcision: are we informing men correctly?. Urol Int. 2005; 75(1): 62-6. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 8 April 2023.
