Foreskin play: Difference between revisions

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Add external link.
Wikify.
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Construction Site}}
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the name given to the common practice of [[foreskinned]] males of gently manipulating their [[foreskin]] to obtain [[body pleasure]] and comfort while relaxing privately. The practice is distinguished from [[masturbation]], as it does not include stimulating an [[erection]] and/or [[ejaculation]].
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is the name given to the common practice of [[foreskinned]] males of gently manipulating their [[foreskin]] when relaxing privately. The practice is distinguished from [[masturbation]], as it does not include stimulating an [[erection]] and/or [[ejaculation]].


The practice originates in early childhood, as it is well known that [[Care_of_intact,_foreskinned_boys#Behavior_of_young_intact_boys| young boys will tug and play]] with their [[foreskin]]. The practice among adults is becoming better known due to anonymous discussions on social media,<ref>See LINKS section.</ref> however the extent of the practice among [[intact]] men is unknown.
The practice originates in early childhood, as it is well known that [[Care_of_intact,_foreskinned_boys#Behavior_of_young_intact_boys| young intact boys will tug and play]] with their [[foreskin]].<ref name="4play">{{REFweb
|url=http://acroposthion.com/foreskin-4play/
|title=Foreskin 4Play
|last=Anonymous
|first=
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=Acroposthion
|date=
|accessdate=2025-10-28
}}</ref> The practice among adults of using the foreskin as a toy or plaything<ref name="4play" /> is becoming better known due to anonymous discussions on social media,<ref>See LINKS section.</ref> however, the extent of the practice among [[intact]] men is unknown.


The pleasant sensations produced by the foreskin have been long reported in the medical literature.<ref name="morgan1967">{{REFjournal
The pleasant sensations produced by the [[foreskin]] have long been reported in the medical literature.<ref name="morgan1967">{{REFjournal
  |last=Morgan
  |last=Morgan
  |first=William Keith C.
  |first=William Keith C.
Line 51: Line 60:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


[[James W. Prescott| Prescott]] (1975) suggested lack of body pleasure is a cause of violence.<ref name="prescott1975">{{REFjournal
|last=Prescott
|init=JW
|author-link=James W. Prescott
|url=http://www.violence.de/prescott/bulletin/article.html
|title=Body Pleasure and the Origins of Violence
|journal=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
|date=1975-11
|volume=
|issue=
|pages=10-20
|accessdate=2022-11-05
}}</ref>
[[Amputation]] of the [[foreskin]] by [[circumcision]] disables foreskin play and receipt of [[body pleasure]] from the foreskin.<ref name="andersen2025">{{REFjournal
|last=Andersen-Giberson
|init=D
|author-link=Dale Andersen
|url=https://cdd.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/cdd/article/view/39786/36016
|title=Circumcision and forced disability: Routine male neonatal circumcision and the consequences of amputation within a critical disability studies framework
|journal=Critical Disability Discourses
|date=2025-12
|volume=10
|issue=2
|pages=1-37
|URL=https://cdd.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/cdd/article/view/39786/36016
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.25071/1918-6215.39786
|accessdate=2026-03-12
|quote=In a critical disability studies framework, it is argued that the act of amputating healthy erogenous tissue and the consequences of that amputation cause disability, particularly from a counter-hegemonic lens.
|format=PDF
|accessdate=2026-03-13
}}
</ref>
{{SEEALSO}}  
{{SEEALSO}}  
* [[Acroposthion]]
* [[Body pleasure]]
* [[Circumcision and violence]]
* [[Erogenous sensation of the foreskin]]
* [[Living with a foreskin in circumcised America]]
* [[Manual tugging]]
* [[Manual tugging]]
* [[Meissner's corpuscles]]
* [[Meissner's corpuscles]]
* [[Ridged band]]
* [[Ridged band]]
* [[Urination by foreskinned men]]
{{LINKS}}
{{LINKS}}
* {{REFweb
* {{REFweb
Line 89: Line 137:




 
[[Category:Education]]
[[Category:Foreskinned life]]
[[Category:Foreskinned life]]
[[Category:Male sexuality]]
[[Category:Sexuality]]
[[Category:Teen]]

Latest revision as of 12:02, 13 March 2026

Foreskin play is the name given to the common practice of foreskinned males of gently manipulating their foreskin to obtain body pleasure and comfort while relaxing privately. The practice is distinguished from masturbation, as it does not include stimulating an erection and/or ejaculation.

The practice originates in early childhood, as it is well known that young intact boys will tug and play with their foreskin.[1] The practice among adults of using the foreskin as a toy or plaything[1] is becoming better known due to anonymous discussions on social media,[2] however, the extent of the practice among intact men is unknown.

The pleasant sensations produced by the foreskin have long been reported in the medical literature.[3] [4]

Prescott (1975) suggested lack of body pleasure is a cause of violence.[5]

Amputation of the foreskin by circumcision disables foreskin play and receipt of body pleasure from the foreskin.[6]

See also

References

  1. a b REFweb Anonymous. Foreskin 4Play, Acroposthion. Retrieved 28 October 2025.
  2. See LINKS section.
  3. REFjournal Morgan WKC. Penile Plunder. Med J Aust. 27 May 1967; 1(21): 1102-3. PMID. Retrieved 27 October 2025.
  4. REFjournal Falliers CJ. Circumcision. JAMA. December 1970; 214(12): 2194. PMID. Retrieved 27 October 2025.
  5. REFjournal Prescott JW. Body Pleasure and the Origins of Violence. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. November 1975; : 10-20. Retrieved 5 November 2022.
  6. REFjournal Andersen-Giberson D. Circumcision and forced disability: Routine male neonatal circumcision and the consequences of amputation within a critical disability studies framework PDF. Critical Disability Discourses. December 2025; 10(2): 1-37. DOI. Retrieved 13 March 2026.
    Quote: In a critical disability studies framework, it is argued that the act of amputating healthy erogenous tissue and the consequences of that amputation cause disability, particularly from a counter-hegemonic lens.