Difference between revisions of "Richard Duncker"
m (added image) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add SEEALSO section.) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:RichardDuncker2019.jpg|thumb|Richard Duncker 2019]] | [[File:RichardDuncker2019.jpg|thumb|Richard Duncker 2019]] | ||
| − | + | '''Richard Duncker''' is a British [[Intactivists|intactivist]], chair of the UK charity, [[Genital Autonomy]], and founder of [[Men Do Complain]]. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | '''Richard Duncker''' is a | ||
Richard Duncker created the [[Bloodstained Men|Bloodstained Suit]] and wore the first suit in a [[Men Do Complain]] demonstration in the UK outside the Department of Health in Whitehall. | Richard Duncker created the [[Bloodstained Men|Bloodstained Suit]] and wore the first suit in a [[Men Do Complain]] demonstration in the UK outside the Department of Health in Whitehall. | ||
| − | + | ==Video== | |
| − | Video interview by [[James Loewen]] for the [http://intactwiki.org/wiki/Category:Bonobo3D_channel Bonobo3D Youtube Channel], recorded in Helsinki, Finland, October 2012: | + | Video interview by [[James Loewen]] for the [http://intactwiki.org/wiki/Category:Bonobo3D_channel Bonobo3D Youtube Channel], recorded in Helsinki, [[Finland]], October 2012: |
<youtube>I53bgxGl88A</youtube> | <youtube>I53bgxGl88A</youtube> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 12: | ||
|Text=Thank you to everyone involved for organising this timely opportunity to mark the 8th anniversary of the [[Cologne circumcision court judgment|ruling by the Cologne Court]] that non-therapeutic male circumcision is actual bodily harm. That ruling was immediately [[German Circumcision Act|politically sidelined]]. But the thought is out there in the political, public and judicial domains. | |Text=Thank you to everyone involved for organising this timely opportunity to mark the 8th anniversary of the [[Cologne circumcision court judgment|ruling by the Cologne Court]] that non-therapeutic male circumcision is actual bodily harm. That ruling was immediately [[German Circumcision Act|politically sidelined]]. But the thought is out there in the political, public and judicial domains. | ||
| − | The idea that is OK to cut a healthy bit off a healthy child is a hard thing to justify. There are now an ever growing number of academics from various disciplines examining circumcision with un-blinkered eyes. The physical sciences now quite clearly show that the [[foreskin]] is specialised erogenous tissue. The lawyers, ethicists, and philosophers are no longer afraid to tackle the issue of non-therapeutic genital cutting, and many have pointed to the alarming way basic rights are denied to a great many children, boys, girls, and those born with variations of genital anatomy. | + | The idea that is OK to cut a healthy bit off a healthy child is a hard thing to justify. There are now an ever growing number of academics from various disciplines examining [[circumcision]] with un-blinkered eyes. The physical sciences now quite clearly show that the [[foreskin]] is specialised erogenous tissue. The lawyers, ethicists, and philosophers are no longer afraid to tackle the issue of non-therapeutic genital cutting, and many have pointed to the alarming way basic rights are denied to a great many children, boys, girls, and those born with variations of genital anatomy. |
The [[Religion and culture|religions and cultures]] that practice non-therapeutic genital cutting now have a growing body of people within them who are questioning the practices. | The [[Religion and culture|religions and cultures]] that practice non-therapeutic genital cutting now have a growing body of people within them who are questioning the practices. | ||
| Line 33: | Line 28: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | + | <br> | |
<youtube>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VhcVUQRbns&list=PLP3sy53e5kvFnGCYvkFmpJz9dGS0dzkcX&index=4</youtube> | <youtube>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VhcVUQRbns&list=PLP3sy53e5kvFnGCYvkFmpJz9dGS0dzkcX&index=4</youtube> | ||
| − | + | {{SEEALSO}} | |
| + | * [[United Kingdom]] | ||
{{LINKS}} | {{LINKS}} | ||
* {{URL-FBprofile|richard.duncker|2020-05-13}} | * {{URL-FBprofile|richard.duncker|2020-05-13}} | ||
| Line 46: | Line 42: | ||
[[Category:Male]] | [[Category:Male]] | ||
| + | [[Category:BSM]] | ||
[[Category:Intactivist]] | [[Category:Intactivist]] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:47, 24 April 2024
Richard Duncker is a British intactivist, chair of the UK charity, Genital Autonomy, and founder of Men Do Complain.
Richard Duncker created the Bloodstained Suit and wore the first suit in a Men Do Complain demonstration in the UK outside the Department of Health in Whitehall.
Contents
Video
Video interview by James Loewen for the Bonobo3D Youtube Channel, recorded in Helsinki, Finland, October 2012:
In 2020 he spoke in a video message on WWDOGA:
| “ | Thank you to everyone involved for organising this timely opportunity to mark the 8th anniversary of the ruling by the Cologne Court that non-therapeutic male circumcision is actual bodily harm. That ruling was immediately politically sidelined. But the thought is out there in the political, public and judicial domains.
The idea that is OK to cut a healthy bit off a healthy child is a hard thing to justify. There are now an ever growing number of academics from various disciplines examining circumcision with un-blinkered eyes. The physical sciences now quite clearly show that the foreskin is specialised erogenous tissue. The lawyers, ethicists, and philosophers are no longer afraid to tackle the issue of non-therapeutic genital cutting, and many have pointed to the alarming way basic rights are denied to a great many children, boys, girls, and those born with variations of genital anatomy. The religions and cultures that practice non-therapeutic genital cutting now have a growing body of people within them who are questioning the practices. In our many groups and organisations we are now a movement to be reckoned with. A movement that provides support, a voice for victims, and the will to hold the authorities to account, for what is essentially a non-accidental injury in child protection law and a wounding in criminal law. The Worldwide Day of Genital Autonomy has provided a clear focus on the important issue which is providing children with protection from non-therapeutic genital cutting in all its forms and manifestations.– Richard Duncker (WWDOGA 2020)[1] |
See also
External links
Facebook profile. Retrieved 13 May 2020.
References
- ↑
WWDOGA 2020 - Richard Duncker
, YouTube, MOGiS e.V.. Retrieved 13 May 2020.