HIV trials in Africa: Difference between revisions

m Revise text.
Add text and citation.
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In 2005 and 2007, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were carried out in Africa in an attempt to prove a hypothesis of certain [[circumcision advocate|circumcision promoters]] despite the known [[Immunological and protective function of the foreskin| immunological functions]] of the [[foreskin]], to link HIV infection to lack of [[circumcision]].
In 2005 and 2007, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were carried out in Africa in an attempt to prove a hypothesis of certain [[circumcision advocate|circumcision promoters]] despite the known [[Immunological and protective function of the foreskin| immunological functions]] of the [[foreskin]], to link [[HIV]] infection to lack of [[circumcision]].


These trials were carried out in
These trials were carried out in
* South Africa:
* [[South Africa]]:
: {{RCT Auvert et al 2005}}
: {{RCT Auvert et al 2005}}
* Kenya:
* Kenya:
Line 10: Line 10:


The 2007 RCTs in Kenya and Uganda were funded by NIAID director [[Anthony Fauci]].
The 2007 RCTs in Kenya and Uganda were funded by NIAID director [[Anthony Fauci]].
[[PEPFAR]] (2025) has scrapped its ineffective and harmful "voluntary male  medical circumcision" (VMMC) program after 15 years and at least 27,000,000 harmful and useless [[foreskin]] amputations.<ref name="gwarisa2025">{{REFnews
|title=New PEPFAR Waiver Scraps Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Program
|url=https://healthtimes.co.zw/2025/02/07/new-pepfar-waiver-scraps-voluntary-medical-male-circumcision-program/
|last=Gwarisa
|first=Michael
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=Healthtimes
|website=
|date=2025-02-07
|accessdate=2025-02-16
|format=
|quote=
}}</ref> The [[United States]] government will no longer pay for harmful circumcisions in Africa.


== 60% HIV protection myth ==
== 60% HIV protection myth ==
Line 67: Line 82:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Two massive populalation studies found no evidence of a protective effect from circumcision.<ref name="mayan2021">{{REFjournal
|last=Mayan
|first=Madhur
|init=M
|author-link=
|last2=Hamilton
|first2=Robert J.
|init2=RJ
|author2-link=
|last3=Juurlink
|first3=David N.
|init3=DN
|author3-link=
|last4=Austin
|first4=Peter C.
|init4=PC
|author4-link=
|last5=Jarvi
|first5=Keith A.
|init5=KA
|author5-link=
|etal=no
|title=Circumcision and Risk of HIV Among Males From Ontario, Canada
|journal=J Urol
|date=2021-09-23
|volume=
|issue=
|article=
|page=
|pages=
|url=https://www.auajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1097/JU.0000000000002234
|quote=We found that circumcision was not independently associated with the risk of acquiring HIV among men from Ontario, Canada.
|pubmedID=34551593
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1097/JU.0000000000002234
|accessdate=2022-01-07
}}</ref><ref name="frisch2021">{{FrischM SimonsenJ 2021}}</ref>
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[HIV]]
* [[South Africa]]
{{REF}}
{{REF}}


Line 76: Line 131:
[[Category:South Africa]]
[[Category:South Africa]]
[[Category:Uganda]]
[[Category:Uganda]]
[[de:HIV-Studien in Afrika]]