Difference between revisions of "Haiba Sonyika"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Relocate material.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add SEEALSO section; Add category.) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|date=2011-11-09 | |date=2011-11-09 | ||
|accessdate=2012-11-13 | |accessdate=2012-11-13 | ||
| − | }}</ref>. In 2004 Sonyika performed a circumcision of a newborn that amputated a large portion of his glans.<ref name="Bollinger">{{REFweb | + | }}</ref>. In 2004 Sonyika performed a [[circumcision]] of a newborn that amputated a large portion of his [[glans]].<ref name="Bollinger">{{REFweb |
|quote= | |quote= | ||
|url=http://www.icgi.org/2009/03/atlanta-attorneys-celebrate-botched-circumcision-verdict-for-mother-and-son/ | |url=http://www.icgi.org/2009/03/atlanta-attorneys-celebrate-botched-circumcision-verdict-for-mother-and-son/ | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| − | The AAP's policy statements were not re-affirmed so they expired in 2017. | + | The AAP's policy statements were not re-affirmed so they expired in 2017. The AAP now has NO official position statement regarding [[circumcision]]. |
== Medical malpractice == | == Medical malpractice == | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
== Botched circumcision == | == Botched circumcision == | ||
| − | In 2004 Sonyika [[circumcised]] a one week old baby. The nurse assisting in the circumcision noted excessive [[bleeding]] and believed that excess tissue had been removed. In fact, a large portion of his [[glans penis]] had been severed. The lawsuit indicated medical negligence in the treatment of the severed tissue, which would have been possible to reattach if proper care and attention had been given within 8 hours. Instead, the tissue was placed in a biohazard bag and left at the nurses’ station. No doctor came in to examine the child after the nurse noted the severed tip. The tissue with the tip in it was eventually sent to pathology. The pathologist’s report confirmed the loss of part of the glans penis. A local pediatric urologist eventually diagnosed the boy with a significant circumcision injury resulting in an [[iatrogenic]] hypospadias, a physician-caused condition where the urinary opening is on the underside of the penis. | + | In 2004 Sonyika [[circumcised]] a one week old baby. The nurse assisting in the [[circumcision]] noted excessive [[bleeding]] and believed that excess tissue had been removed. In fact, a large portion of his [[glans penis]] had been severed. The lawsuit indicated medical negligence in the treatment of the severed tissue, which would have been possible to reattach if proper care and attention had been given within 8 hours. Instead, the tissue was placed in a biohazard bag and left at the nurses’ station. No doctor came in to examine the child after the nurse noted the severed tip. The tissue with the tip in it was eventually sent to pathology. The pathologist’s report confirmed the loss of part of the [[glans penis]]. A local pediatric urologist eventually diagnosed the boy with a significant [[Documented severe complications of circumcision| circumcision injury]] resulting in an [[iatrogenic]] [[hypospadias]], a physician-caused condition where the urinary opening is on the underside of the [[penis]]. |
The lawsuit indicated that the boy and his family would need significant psychiatric counseling at various stages of his life in order to avoid a bad psychological outcome. | The lawsuit indicated that the boy and his family would need significant psychiatric counseling at various stages of his life in order to avoid a bad psychological outcome. | ||
The jury found Drs. Sonyika and Dr. Cheryl J. Kendall, the child’s pediatrician, liable and awarded $1,800,000 to the child. The mother was awarded $500,000 for future medical expenses for psychiatric counseling while the boy is a minor. The hospital was not found liable.<ref name="Bollinger"/> | The jury found Drs. Sonyika and Dr. Cheryl J. Kendall, the child’s pediatrician, liable and awarded $1,800,000 to the child. The mother was awarded $500,000 for future medical expenses for psychiatric counseling while the boy is a minor. The hospital was not found liable.<ref name="Bollinger"/> | ||
| + | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
| + | * [[Human rights]] | ||
| + | * [[Intactivism]] | ||
| + | * [[United States of America]] | ||
| + | {{LINKS}} | ||
| + | {{ABBR}} | ||
| + | {{REF}} | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{DEFAULTSORT:Sonyika, Haiba}} |
| − | + | ||
| − | |||
[[Category:Person]] | [[Category:Person]] | ||
[[Category:Female]] | [[Category:Female]] | ||
| − | + | [[Category:Genital mutilation]] | |
[[Category:Perpetrator]] | [[Category:Perpetrator]] | ||
[[Category:Physician]] | [[Category:Physician]] | ||
| Line 85: | Line 91: | ||
[[Category:From CircLeaks]] | [[Category:From CircLeaks]] | ||
[[Category:From IntactWiki]] | [[Category:From IntactWiki]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:USA]] | ||
[[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]] | [[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:53, 7 May 2024
|
Dr. Haiba Sonyika, M.D.[a 1], is a female M.D.[a 1] with over 25 years of experience who practices Obstetrics & Gynecology in Georgia.[1]. In 2004 Sonyika performed a circumcision of a newborn that amputated a large portion of his glans.[2]
On August 27th of 2012 the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) presented a new Policy Statement on Circumcision and Technical Report stating that "the benefits outweigh the risks", yet when it comes a complications like this one, the technical report states that "Financial costs of care, emotional tolls, or the need for future corrective surgery (with the attendant anesthetic risks, family stress, and expense) are unknown.[3]
The AAP's policy statements were not re-affirmed so they expired in 2017. The AAP now has NO official position statement regarding circumcision.
Contents
Medical malpractice
In 2001 Sonyika attended a birth in which a female baby suffered permanent and catastrophic neurological injuries, including brain damage and other devastating physical and mental injuries as result of negligence. The parents of the baby were entitled to a recovery against the Defendants for all damages allowed by law.[4]
Botched circumcision
In 2004 Sonyika circumcised a one week old baby. The nurse assisting in the circumcision noted excessive bleeding and believed that excess tissue had been removed. In fact, a large portion of his glans penis had been severed. The lawsuit indicated medical negligence in the treatment of the severed tissue, which would have been possible to reattach if proper care and attention had been given within 8 hours. Instead, the tissue was placed in a biohazard bag and left at the nurses’ station. No doctor came in to examine the child after the nurse noted the severed tip. The tissue with the tip in it was eventually sent to pathology. The pathologist’s report confirmed the loss of part of the glans penis. A local pediatric urologist eventually diagnosed the boy with a significant circumcision injury resulting in an iatrogenic hypospadias, a physician-caused condition where the urinary opening is on the underside of the penis.
The lawsuit indicated that the boy and his family would need significant psychiatric counseling at various stages of his life in order to avoid a bad psychological outcome.
The jury found Drs. Sonyika and Dr. Cheryl J. Kendall, the child’s pediatrician, liable and awarded $1,800,000 to the child. The mother was awarded $500,000 for future medical expenses for psychiatric counseling while the boy is a minor. The hospital was not found liable.[2]
See also
External links
Abbreviations
- ↑ a b
Doctor of Medicine
, Wikipedia. Retrieved 14 June 2021. In the United Kingdom, Ireland and some Commonwealth countries, the abbreviation MD is common.
References
- ↑ (9 November 2011).
Dr. Haiba Sonyica
, Vitals.com. Retrieved 13 November 2012. - ↑ a b Bollinger, Dan (29 April 2009).
Atlanta attorneys celebrate botched circumcision verdict for mother and son
, International Coalition for Genital Integrity. Retrieved 13 November 2012. - ↑
Male Circumcision - Technical Report. Pediatrics. 27 August 2012; 130(3): e775. Retrieved 12 November 2012.
Quote:Financial costs of care, emotional tolls, or the need for future corrective surgery (with the attendant anesthetic risks, family stress, and expense) are unknown.
- ↑
Complaint for Medical Malpractice
. Retrieved 13 November 2012.
