Canadian Paediatric Society: Difference between revisions

Line 68:

|accessdate=2026-03-13

}}

</ref> The CPS seems unwilling to recognise and protect the legal rights of its child patients. The CPS seems more interested in the ~~best interests~~ of its fellows than in the health and well-being of the male infants of [[Canada]].

</ref> The CPS seems unwilling to recognise and protect the legal rights of its child patients. The CPS seems more interested in the financial well-being of its fellows than in the health and well-being of the male infants of [[Canada]].

The ~~2026 statment~~ fails to discuss the function of the [[foreskin]], the [[amputation]] of which has a disabling effect on various protective and sexual functions.<ref name="andersen2025" />

The 2016 statement fails to discuss the function of the [[foreskin]], the [[amputation]] of which has a disabling effect on various protective and sexual functions.<ref name="andersen2025" />

The 2016 statement disrespects the First Nations people of Canada by failing to note that circumcision is not part of their culture.

The 2016 CPS statement of position on [[circumcision of the newborn]] was poorly drafted in 2016, has not improved with age, and is now outmoded by advances in medical science and [[human rights]], so it should be withdrawn.

@@ Line 68: / Line 68: @@
   |accessdate=2026-03-13
 }}
-</ref> The CPS seems unwilling to recognise and protect the legal rights of its child patients. The CPS seems more interested in the best interests of its fellows than in the health and well-being of the male infants of [[Canada]].
+</ref> The CPS seems unwilling to recognise and protect the legal rights of its child patients. The CPS seems more interested in the financial well-being of its fellows than in the health and well-being of the male infants of [[Canada]].
-The 2026 statment fails to discuss the function of the [[foreskin]], the [[amputation]] of which has a disabling effect on various protective and sexual functions.<ref name="andersen2025" />
+The 2016 statement fails to discuss the function of the [[foreskin]], the [[amputation]] of which has a disabling effect on various protective and sexual functions.<ref name="andersen2025" />
+The 2016 statement disrespects the First Nations people of Canada by failing to note that circumcision is not part of their culture.
 The 2016 CPS statement of position on [[circumcision of the newborn]] was poorly drafted in 2016, has not improved with age, and is now outmoded by advances in medical science and [[human rights]], so it should be withdrawn.