Ethics of non-therapeutic child circumcision: Difference between revisions
m adjust <page>/<pages> values |
m reformat Adler 2ß13 |
||
| Line 662: | Line 662: | ||
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/povenmire/ | |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/povenmire/ | ||
|accessdate=2013-11-25 | |accessdate=2013-11-25 | ||
}}</ref><ref name="conundrum"/><ref name="Adler"> | }}</ref><ref name="conundrum"/><ref name="Adler">{{REFjournal | ||
|first=Peter W. | |||
|last=Adler | |||
|author-link=Peter W. Adler | |||
|url=http://rjolpi.richmond.edu/archive/Adler_Formatted.pdf | |||
|title=Is Circumcision Legal? | |||
|volume=16 | |||
|issue=3 | |||
|journal=Richmond J. L. & Pub. Int. | |||
|page=439 | |||
|date=2013 | |||
}}</ref> Richards (1996) argues that parents may only consent to medical care, so are not empowered to grant consent for non-therapeutic circumcision of a child because it is not medical care.<ref name="richards">{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Richards | |last=Richards | ||
|first=D. | |first=D. | ||