Immunological and protective function of the foreskin: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add reference. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add reference |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Although it was once claimed that the human foreskin was filthy and harbored disease and infection, in reality the opposite is true. The [[foreskin]] is designed by nature to be self cleaning and to provide significant natural '''immunological and protective function''' against all types of infection, including HIV. | Although it was once claimed that the human [[foreskin]] was filthy and harbored disease and infection, in reality the opposite is true. The [[foreskin]] is designed by nature to be self cleaning and to provide significant natural '''immunological and protective function''' against all types of infection, including HIV. | ||
== The protective and hygienic function of the foreskin == | == The protective and hygienic function of the foreskin == | ||
The foreskin, like the eyelid, also serves an important protective and hygienic function. The foreskin protects the delicate [[glans]] of the [[penis]] and puts the urethra at a distance form its environment, protecting it from foreign contaminants of all kinds while simultaneously shielding the penis from injury. It is a double fold of skin which offers two layers of protection. | The [[foreskin]], like the eyelid, also serves an important protective and hygienic function. The foreskin protects the delicate [[glans]] of the [[penis]] and puts the urethra at a distance form its environment, protecting it from foreign contaminants of all kinds while simultaneously shielding the penis from injury. It is a double fold of skin which offers two layers of protection. | ||
At birth, the foreskin is usually attached to the glans (head) of the penis by a [[synechia]], akin to how a fingernail is attached to a finger.<ref>{{REFjournal | At birth, the [[foreskin]] is usually attached to the glans (head) of the penis by a [[synechia]], akin to how a fingernail is attached to a finger.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Deibert | |last=Deibert | ||
|first=G.A. | |first=G.A. | ||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
|accessdate=2020-01-09 | |accessdate=2020-01-09 | ||
|note=Jan-Feb 2006 | |note=Jan-Feb 2006 | ||
}}</ref> <ref>{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Upadhyay | |||
|first=V | |||
|author-link= | |||
|last2=Hammodat | |||
|first2=HM | |||
|author2-link= | |||
|last3=Pease | |||
|first3=PW | |||
|author3-link= | |||
|etal=no | |||
|title=Post circumcision meatal stenosis | |||
|trans-title= | |||
|language= | |||
|journal=N Z Med J | |||
|location= | |||
|date=1998-02-27 | |||
|volume=111 | |||
|issue=1060 | |||
|pages=57-8 | |||
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/complications/upadhyay1/ | |||
|quote= | |||
|pubmedID=9539919 | |||
|pubmedCID= | |||
|DOI= | |||
|accessdate=2020-01-10 | |||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| Line 145: | Line 171: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
The idea that the foreskin is "dirty" or "unclean" is a scientifically unfounded superstition. The intact penis is naturally clean and maintains a level of hygiene that is optimal when compared to a penis that has been altered by circumcision. | The idea that the foreskin is "dirty" or "unclean" is a scientifically unfounded superstition. The intact penis is naturally clean and maintains a level of hygiene that is optimal when compared to a penis that has been altered by circumcision.<ref name="fleiss-hodges-vanhowe1998" /> | ||
In comparison, due to the open wounds and raw bleeding flesh, the circumcised penis needs much more care after circumcision. The surgically externalized glans is dirty rather then clean because of constant exposure to dirt, abrasion and contaminants.<ref name="vanhowe1997">{{REFjournal | In comparison, due to the open wounds and raw bleeding flesh, the circumcised penis needs much more care after circumcision. The surgically externalized glans is dirty rather then clean because of constant exposure to dirt, abrasion and contaminants.<ref name="vanhowe1997">{{REFjournal | ||