Sexual injury of circumcision: Difference between revisions

Revise text.
mNo edit summary
Line 83: Line 83:
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


Therefore, it appears that Masters & Johnson performed little or no testing on the foreskins of their few intact subjects and provided no useful information.<ref name="sorrells2007">{{REFjournal
Therefore, it appears that Masters & Johnson (1966) performed little or no testing on the foreskins of their few intact subjects and provided no useful information.<ref name="sorrells2007">{{REFjournal
  |last=Sorrells
  |last=Sorrells
  |first=Morris L.
  |first=Morris L.
Line 517: Line 517:
  |DOI=10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65097-5
  |DOI=10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65097-5
  |date=2002
  |date=2002
  |accessdate=
  |accessdate=2020-02-18
}}</ref><ref name="kimpang2006"/>
}}</ref><ref name="kimpang2006"/>


Line 528: Line 528:
  |last2=Pang
  |last2=Pang
  |title=The effect of male circumcision on sexuality
  |title=The effect of male circumcision on sexuality
  |journal=BJU International
  |journal=BJU Int
  |volume=99
  |volume=99
  |issue=3
  |issue=3
Line 603: Line 603:
In a telephone survey of 10,173 Australian men, 22% of uncircumcised men and 26% of circumcised men reported reaching orgasm too quickly for at least one month in the previous year. The difference was not statistically significant.<ref name="richters2006"/>
In a telephone survey of 10,173 Australian men, 22% of uncircumcised men and 26% of circumcised men reported reaching orgasm too quickly for at least one month in the previous year. The difference was not statistically significant.<ref name="richters2006"/>


In a study of 255 circumcised men and 118 uncircumcised men, Kim and Pang reported no statistically significant difference in ejaculation or ejaculation latency time between circumcised and uncircumcised participants.<ref name="kimpang2006"/>
In a study of 255 circumcised men and 118 uncircumcised men, Kim & Pang (2006{ reported no statistically significant difference in ejaculation or ejaculation latency time between circumcised and uncircumcised participants.<ref name="kimpang2006"/>


In a study of men circumcised for benign disease, Masood ''et al.'' reported that of those who stated they had prior premature ejaculation, 13% reported improvement after circumcision, 33% reported that it became worse, and 53% reported no change.<ref name="masood2005"/>
In a study of men circumcised for benign disease, Masood ''et al.'' reported that of those who stated they had prior premature ejaculation, 13% reported improvement after circumcision, 33% reported that it became worse, and 53% reported no change.<ref name="masood2005"/>
Line 611: Line 611:
== Sexual practice and masturbation ==
== Sexual practice and masturbation ==


In a study by Korean researchers of 255 men circumcised after the age of 20 and 18 who were not circumcised, Kim and Pang reported that masturbatory pleasure decreased in 48% of the respondents and increased in 8%. [[Masturbation|Masturbatory]] difficulty increased in 63% but was easier in 37%. They concluded that there was a decrease in masturbatory pleasure after circumcision.<ref name="kimpang2006"/>
In a study by Korean researchers of 255 men circumcised after the age of 20 and 18 who were not circumcised, Kim & Pang reported that masturbatory pleasure decreased in 48% of the respondents and increased in 8%. [[Masturbation|Masturbatory]] difficulty increased in 63% but was easier in 37%. They concluded that there was a decrease in masturbatory pleasure after circumcision.<ref name="kimpang2006"/>


Laumann ''et al.'' reported that circumcised men in their survey displayed a greater rates of experience of various sexual practices, including oral sex, anal sex, and [[masturbation]].<ref name="Laumann1997">{{REFjournal
Laumann ''et al.'' reported that circumcised men in their survey displayed a greater rates of experience of various sexual practices, including oral sex, anal sex, and [[masturbation]].<ref name="Laumann1997">{{REFjournal
Line 640: Line 640:
== Sexual drive ==
== Sexual drive ==


Several studies have investigated the effect of circumcision on sexual drive. Studies that did not find a statistically significant difference include Kim and Pang,<ref name="kimpang2006"/> Collins ''et al.'',<ref name="Collins2002"/> and Senkul ''et al.''.<ref name="senkul2004"/> \
Several studies have investigated the effect of circumcision on sexual drive. Studies that did not find a statistically significant difference include Kim & Pang,<ref name="kimpang2006"/> Collins ''et al.'',<ref name="Collins2002"/> and Senkul ''et al.''.<ref name="senkul2004"/> \


== Satisfaction ==
== Satisfaction ==